The Acer Aspire 3 14 provides value as a budget-friendly option with a Ryzen processor, which is capable for general use, but its performance may not be sufficient for more intensive engineering, 3D rendering, or gaming. Its portability is reasonable, and the battery life should handle basic tasks well. On the other hand, the Apple MacBook Pro 16 offers superior performance with an Intel CPU and dedicated Radeon graphics, making it well-suited for engineering, machine learning, and gaming. It provides a higher-resolution screen and is known for its build quality and longer battery life but comes with a higher price tag and more weight, impacting portability. Choose the Acer for basic use and saving money, or go for the MacBook Pro if performance and screen quality are top priorities and you're willing to invest more. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Aspire 3 14
Very good portability
Advantages of the Apple MacBook Pro 16 (Late 2019)
Good for engineering and design
Very good for content creation
Good overall display quality
Best in class overall build quality
Very good battery life
Best in class speakers
Best in class keyboard
Key differences
General Use
7.0/10
7.8/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3072 x 1920
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
250.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
477.0 nits
9.5 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
12.0 Hours
6.2/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.5/10
8.3/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
7.7/10
The Apple MacBook Pro 16 (Late 2019) and Acer Aspire 3 14 are both good for general use, though the Apple MacBook Pro 16 (Late 2019) is somewhat better.
The Acer Aspire 3 14 offers ample storage and a good CPU for basic tasks, with the added benefit of being lighter and having silent operation, which might appeal to those who prioritize portability and quiet performance. On the other hand, the Apple MacBook Pro 16 provides a more powerful CPU, double the RAM for multitasking, a superior screen with higher resolution and brightness, and better overall build quality, which justifies its higher price for users who need more robust performance and premium features for intensive workloads.
Engineering and Design
6.1/10
7.5/10
4.3/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.5/10
3.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
4.2/10
8.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The Apple MacBook Pro 16 (Late 2019) is good for engineering and design, while the Acer Aspire 3 14 is only fair.
The Acer Aspire 3 14 has a mid-range processor and graphics card, making it suitable for basic engineering and design tasks, offering a balance of performance and portability with a fair keyboard quality. In contrast, the Apple MacBook Pro 16 has a more powerful processor and graphics card, twice the memory, and a higher-quality display, which is essential for intensive engineering and design work, along with a superior keyboard and speaker quality, though it is heavier and less portable.
Content Creation
7.2/10
8.0/10
4.3/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.5/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3072 x 1920
8.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Apple MacBook Pro 16 (Late 2019) is very good for content creation, while the Acer Aspire 3 14 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.1/10
7.9/10
4.3/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.5/10
8.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3072 x 1920
6.2/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.5/10
The Apple MacBook Pro 16 (Late 2019) and Acer Aspire 3 14 are both good for software development, though the Apple MacBook Pro 16 (Late 2019) is somewhat better.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
6.1/10
7.8/10
14.0in
SIZE
16.0in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3072 x 1920
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
250.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
477.0 nits
The Apple MacBook Pro 16 has a better screen than the Acer Aspire 3 14 for general use, AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
The Acer Aspire 3 14 offers sufficient resolution and brightness for daily tasks, but it falls short for engineering and design due to limited color gamut coverage; its low refresh rate also makes it less ideal for gaming and 3D work. The Apple MacBook Pro 16 excels with a high-resolution display and superior brightness, providing detailed and vibrant images crucial for both general use and color-sensitive engineering and design tasks, but like the Acer, it's not optimized for 3D because of a standard refresh rate. While the MacBook Pro offers better overall screen quality, it comes at a higher price point, so those who prioritize work involving color accuracy over gaming may find it a more suitable investment.
Battery
9.5 Hours
12.0 Hours
The Acer Aspire 3 14 has 9.5 hours of battery life. The Apple MacBook Pro 16 has 12 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Very Good
Good
14.0in
SIZE
16.0in
3.0 lbs
WEIGHT
4.3 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
0.6in
The Acer Aspire 3 14 has very good portability, while the Apple MacBook Pro 16 (Late 2019) has good portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
6.2/10
10.0/10
The Apple MacBook Pro 16 (Late 2019) has best in class build quality, while the Acer Aspire 3 14 has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$434
$499
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
The Acer Aspire 3 14 has a price of $434 and the Apple MacBook Pro 16 (Late 2019) costs $499.
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Apple MacBook Pro 16 (Late 2019) to be only fair for gaming and AI, while the Acer Aspire 3 14 is poor.
PerfectRec’s Gaming and AI Score strongly emphasizes graphics processing capability, while also taking into account other factors that impact suitability for gaming and AI work.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Aspire 3 14 and the Apple MacBook Pro 16 (Late 2019) compare to other laptops
"The Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023: M2 Max challenges GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. The new MacBook Pro 16 2023 with the M2 Max SoC is the most powerful laptop Apple has on sale right now. While we do not get the expected performance and efficiency improvements from completely new 3 nm chips, which we expected ahead of the launch, the 2023 model is still a solid update. The CPU of the M2 Max can be up to 20 % faster than the old model and we also see an advantage of 25-30 % for the GPU with 38 cores. However, both components also consume more power, so the efficiency did not change that much under maximum load."
Get a great deal on the Acer Aspire 3 14 or the Apple MacBook Pro 16 (Late 2019)
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About Apple
Apple, an American technology company, is one of the world’s largest company in terms of market capitalization. Their MacBook laptops feature a slim, minimalistic design, class-leading battery life, and premium display and speaker quality. In 2020 Apple switched from using Intel processors to their own silicon chips which have excellent performance and efficiency. The macOS operating system is the second most widely used OS, after Windows.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
123,795
Recommendations made
26,823
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.