The Samsung Q80C is known for being at a midrange price point and offers a higher quality viewing experience, which is good for a variety of content including movies, sports, and gaming. However, it tends to be less suited for very bright rooms. On the other hand, the Samsung CU7000 is less expensive and still provides a decent picture quality that's suitable for general TV watching and news, but may not be the best for high-action content or in darker viewing environments. If you prefer to save money and mainly watch TV shows or news in bright rooms, the CU7000 is a good choice. If you’re willing to pay more for a versatile TV that excels in movie watching, sports, and gaming, and can tolerate some glare in bright rooms, the Q80C is the better option. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Samsung Q80C (LCD)
Good for bright room
Very good for gaming
Good for news, talk, & other TV
Good for cartoons & animation
Good for use as monitor
Good for upscaling
Good viewing angle
Advantages of the Samsung CU7000 (LCD)
The Samsung CU7000 (LCD) has no clear advantages over the Samsung Q80C (LCD).
Key differences
Picture Quality
7.0/10
6.2/10
5.55/10
CONTRAST
5.82/10
7.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
5.6/10
LED FALD
PANEL TYPE
LED
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
The Samsung Q80C (LCD) has good picture quality, while the Samsung CU7000 (LCD) has only fair picture quality.
Gaming
8.1/10
6.0/10
7.8/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
6.5/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.7/10
8.0/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
60.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
30.0/100
8.1/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.9/10
The Samsung Q80C (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the Samsung CU7000 (LCD) is only fair.
The Samsung Q80C has a higher response time score and supports a faster refresh rate, making it very good for gaming as it delivers smoother motion and less blur during fast-paced scenes. In contrast, the Samsung CU7000, while having a similar input lag performance, only supports a standard refresh rate and has a lower response time score which results in fair gaming performance as it may not handle fast-moving content as effectively.
Cartoons & Animation
7.2/10
5.7/10
7.3/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
5.9/10
7.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
5.6/10
8.5/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.2/10
6.5/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
6.0/10
7.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
6.0/10
The Samsung Q80C (LCD) is good for cartoons & animation, while the Samsung CU7000 (LCD) is poor.
The Samsung Q80C is more suitable for cartoons and animation because it displays colors more vibrantly out of the box and has a wider color gamut compared to the Samsung CU7000, resulting in better color reproduction. The CU7000 falls short in these areas, offering less accurate colors and a more limited color range, which are crucial for the vivid and varied hues typically found in animated content.
News, Talk, & Other TV
7.2/10
6.0/10
8.5/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.2/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
6.6/10
The Samsung Q80C (LCD) is good for news, talk, & other TV, while the Samsung CU7000 (LCD) is only fair.
The Samsung Q80C outperforms the CU7000 when watching news and TV programs due to its better upscaling of lower resolution content and superior SDR brightness, making the image crisp and vibrant even in well-lit rooms. While both models offer decent performance for everyday viewing, the better contrast, local dimming, and color accuracy right out of the box contribute to the Q80C's advantage in providing a more pleasing viewing experience.
Bright Room
7.2/10
5.8/10
7.7/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.3/10
8.5/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.2/10
7.3/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.4/10
5.9/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
5.9/10
The Samsung Q80C (LCD) is good for bright room, while the Samsung CU7000 (LCD) is poor.
The Samsung Q80C is better for bright rooms because it has very good SDR and good HDR brightness, helping it overcome ambient light, while the Samsung CU7000 falls short with only fair SDR and poor HDR brightness, struggling in brightly lit environments. Additionally, both TVs have poor reflections handling, but the higher brightness of the Q80C provides a slight edge in combatting glare.
Cost
$1,298
$428
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Samsung Q80C (LCD) has a price of $1,298 and the Samsung CU7000 (LCD) costs $428.
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Samsung Q80C (LCD) to be only fair for movies & TV, while the Samsung CU7000 (LCD) is poor.
The Samsung Q80C offers a more enjoyable movie experience with its more effective local dimming and good black uniformity, which improves contrast and makes dark scenes look better, whereas the Samsung CU7000 falls short in local dimming and has worse black uniformity, making it less suitable for movies that often rely on these features.
Sports
6.8/10
6.6/10
8.0/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
120Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.7/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
6.6/10
8.5/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.2/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The Samsung Q80C (LCD) and Samsung CU7000 (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The Samsung Q80C has a wider viewing angle and better gray uniformity, which are benefits for sports viewing, but its reflection handling is subpar, which could be a drawback in bright rooms. The Samsung CU7000 has a fair response time for motion but its narrower viewing angles and gray uniformity are less ideal for group sports watching or if off-axis viewing is common in your setup. Both TVs have poor reflection handling, so neither is optimal for very bright environments.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Samsung Q80C (LCD) and the Samsung CU7000 (LCD) compare to other TVs
Spec Comparison
Samsung Q80C (LCD)
Samsung CU7000 (LCD)
GENERAL
Price
Price
$1,298
$428
Brand
Brand
Samsung
Samsung
Release Date
Release Date
May 2, 2023
April 5, 2023
Full name
Full name
QN65Q80C
UN65CU7000
Screen Size
Screen Size
65"
65"
Screen Resolution
Screen Resolution
4K
4K
Screen Type
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Screen Sub-type
Screen Sub-type
LED FALD IPS
LED VA
Smart TV
Smart TV
Yes
Yes
TV FEATURES
Operating System
Operating System
Tizen
Tizen
Sound Quality Score
Sound Quality Score
7.3/10
5.9/10
NextGen Ready
NextGen Ready
No
No
HDMI Ports
HDMI Ports
4
3
Coax Ports
Coax Ports
1
1
Refresh Rate
Refresh Rate
120Hz
60Hz
Variable Refresh Rate
Variable Refresh Rate
Yes
No
HDR Supported formats
HDR Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Accessibility
Accessibility
Voice Commands
Voice Commands
DISPLAY QUALITY SCORES
Picture Quality Score
Picture Quality Score
7/10
6.2/10
Bright Room Score
Bright Room Score
7.3/10
5.8/10
Gaming Score
Gaming Score
8.2/10
6/10
Movies & TV Score
Movies & TV Score
6.2/10
5.9/10
Sports Score
Sports Score
6.9/10
6.6/10
News, Talk, & Other TV Score
News, Talk, & Other TV Score
7.3/10
6/10
Cartoons & Animation Score
Cartoons & Animation Score
7.2/10
5.8/10
Use as Monitor Score
Use as Monitor Score
7.8/10
6.3/10
PHYSICAL
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D)
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D)
32.6" x 56.9" x 1.8"
32.7" x 57.1" x 2.4"
Dimensions with Stand (H x W)
Dimensions with Stand (H x W)
35.1" x 56.9"
35.7" x 57.1"
Weight without Stand
Weight without Stand
Unknown
32.7 lbs
VESA Mount
VESA Mount
400 x 300
400 x 300
DISPLAY
Color Depth
Color Depth
10 bit
10 bit
Black Frame Insertion
Black Frame Insertion
Yes
Yes
Auto Low Latency Mode
Auto Low Latency Mode
Yes
Yes
Contrast
Contrast
5.6/10
5.8/10
Local Dimming
Local Dimming
5.7/10
4.1/10
Gaming Local Dimming
Gaming Local Dimming
6/100
3/100
Game HDR Brightness Score
Game HDR Brightness Score
8.1/10
5.9/10
SDR Brightness Score
SDR Brightness Score
8.5/10
6.3/10
HDR Brightness Score
HDR Brightness Score
7.3/10
5.4/10
Gray Uniformity
Gray Uniformity
7/10
6/10
Black Uniformity
Black Uniformity
4.5/10
6.6/10
Viewing Angle
Viewing Angle
7.7/10
5.4/10
Reflections Score
Reflections Score
6/10
5.9/10
Upscaling
Upscaling
7/10
6.7/10
Motion Processing
Motion Processing
8/10
8/10
Color Gamut Score
Color Gamut Score
7.3/10
5.9/10
Color Volume Score
Color Volume Score
7.9/10
5.6/10
Response Time Score
Response Time Score
7.8/10
6.6/10
Input Lag Score
Input Lag Score
10/10
8.8/10
Colors Out of the Box Score
Colors Out of the Box Score
6.5/10
6/10
Quality Control
Quality Control
8/10
8/10
Chroma Subsampling Score
Chroma Subsampling Score
8/10
7/10
SOUND
Speaker Setup
Speaker Setup
2.2
2.0
Speaker Power
Speaker Power
40 W
20 W
Dolby Atmos
Dolby Atmos
Yes
Yes
DTS:X
DTS:X
No
No
Get a great deal on the Samsung Q80C (LCD) or the Samsung CU7000 (LCD)
About Samsung
Samsung, a South Korean electronics manufacturer, holds the title of being the largest global TV vendor in terms of units sold. They offer a diverse lineup of TV products that cater to various budget ranges. A notable achievement in recent years is the development of Quantum Dots, a technology that enhances color reproduction, resulting in richer and more vibrant hues. Samsung TVs are well-regarded for their high manufacturing quality and user-friendly software, making them an excellent choice for consumers seeking an intuitive viewing experience.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
122,430
Recommendations made
18,365
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.