For a lower price, the Samsung Q60A is a cost-effective option, but it features a basic 60Hz LCD panel without advanced lighting technology, which means it has less impressive picture quality and motion handling, making it suitable for casual viewing but not ideal for very bright rooms or fast-moving content such as sports. On the other hand, the Sony X95L, priced at the higher end, boasts a superior 120Hz LCD panel with miniLED technology, offering better brightness, contrast, and color accuracy, which excels in both bright environments and for dynamic content, making it a preferable choice for premium movie watching, sports, and gaming experiences. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Samsung Q60A (LCD)
The Samsung Q60A (LCD) has no clear advantages over the Sony X95L (LCD).
Advantages of the Sony X95L (LCD)
Best in class for bright room
Very good for dark room
Very good for gaming
Very good for movies & TV
Very good for sports
Excellent for news, talk, & other TV
Excellent for cartoons & animation
Good for use as monitor
Best in class for upscaling
Best in class motion processing
Very good reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
7.2/10
8.6/10
7.13/10
CONTRAST
8.00/10
7.7/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
9.0/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
miniLED FALD
VA
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
The Sony X95L (LCD) has very good picture quality, while the Samsung Q60A (LCD) has good picture quality.
Movies & TV
6.5/10
8.4/10
7.13/10
CONTRAST
8.00/10
7.2/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
8.5/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
10.0/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
Yes
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The Sony X95L (LCD) is very good for movies & TV, while the Samsung Q60A (LCD) is only fair.
The Sony X95L provides a very good movie and cinematic TV experience with superior contrast, local dimming, and black uniformity compared to the fair performance of the Samsung Q60A in these areas. Additionally, the Sony X95L offers better performance with out-of-the-box colors, color volume, and viewing angles that are important for these types of content, while the Samsung Q60A has lower capabilities in these aspects.
Sports
6.5/10
8.2/10
7.0/10
MOTION PROCESSING
10.0/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
7.0/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
10.0/10
8.2/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.3/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The Sony X95L (LCD) is very good for sports, while the Samsung Q60A (LCD) is only fair.
The Sony X95L is rated very good for watching sports due to its combination of excellent motion processing and reflection handling, which ensures smooth action and minimal distractions from glare. The Samsung Q60A, while deemed fair for sports, has relatively poorer response time and motion processing, causing more blur during fast movements and is less effective at minimizing reflections, affecting its overall performance in comparison.
Gaming
5.6/10
8.3/10
5.7/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
8.3/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
7.0/10
7.0/10
MOTION PROCESSING
10.0/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
90.0/100
6.9/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.2/10
The Sony X95L (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the Samsung Q60A (LCD) is poor.
I apologize, but there appears to be a technical issue with accessing the document you've provided, which prevents me from reviewing its contents. However, I can still provide general information based on common characteristics of TVs suitable for gaming.
The Samsung Q60A may be considered poor for gaming due to a slower response time, higher input lag, or a lower refresh rate that can cause motion blur or delay in registering inputs, which is detrimental to fast-paced gaming. Conversely, the Sony X95J with its very good gaming performance likely boasts a faster response time, lower input lag, and a higher refresh rate, resulting in smoother motion and more responsive gameplay. These factors are crucial for an immersive gaming experience where every millisecond counts.
Cartoons & Animation
8.2/10
9.1/10
7.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
8.1/10
7.7/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
9.0/10
8.2/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.3/10
8.1/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
8.3/10
7.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
8.5/10
The Sony X95L (LCD) is excellent for cartoons & animation, while the Samsung Q60A (LCD) is very good.
The Sony X95L has excellent color reproduction out of the box and a wider color gamut, which will provide richer and more accurate colors for animations, compared to the Samsung Q60A that has very good performance in these areas but is not as exceptional. Furthermore, the Sony has a better contrast ratio, meaning it can display deeper blacks and more vibrant colors, which enhances the overall viewing experience for animated content compared to the Samsung Q60A which has lower contrast.
News, Talk, & Other TV
7.3/10
9.2/10
8.2/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.3/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
10.0/10
The Sony X95L (LCD) is excellent for news, talk, & other TV, while the Samsung Q60A (LCD) is good.
The Sony X95L excels in upscaling and SDR brightness which enhances the clarity and visibility of news or talk shows, especially in brighter rooms, while the Samsung Q60A performs well but not to the same extent, offering good SDR brightness and upscaling. The Sony X95L's superior contrast and local dimming also contribute to its rich colors and deep blacks, improving picture quality, while the Samsung Q60A provides decent performance in these areas but lacks the same level of refinement.
Bright Room
7.2/10
9.7/10
5.4/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.9/10
8.2/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.3/10
7.0/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.2/10
6.3/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
8.8/10
The Sony X95L (LCD) is best in class for bright room, while the Samsung Q60A (LCD) is good.
The Sony X95L outshines the Samsung Q60A in bright room settings because it delivers superior HDR and SDR brightness, coupled with more effective handling of reflections. While both offer good performance, the Sony's excellent reflection handling and stronger brightness make it the preferred choice for environments with a lot of ambient light, although it may come at a higher price point.
Cost
$498
$4,498
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
The Samsung Q60A (LCD) has a price of $498 and the Sony X95L (LCD) costs $4,498.
"The least expensive QLED is a solid choice for Samsung fans. Right out of the gate my eye was drawn to the Samsung. It is bright. The quantum dots let the Q60A produce far deeper, richer colors than the Vizio and TCL"
Get a great deal on the Samsung Q60A (LCD) or the Sony X95L (LCD)
About Samsung
Samsung, a South Korean electronics manufacturer, holds the title of being the largest global TV vendor in terms of units sold. They offer a diverse lineup of TV products that cater to various budget ranges. A notable achievement in recent years is the development of Quantum Dots, a technology that enhances color reproduction, resulting in richer and more vibrant hues. Samsung TVs are well-regarded for their high manufacturing quality and user-friendly software, making them an excellent choice for consumers seeking an intuitive viewing experience.
About Sony
Sony stands as a highly experienced and widely trusted TV manufacturer, earning a reputation that surpasses all others. A Japanese company, Sony has been making TVs for far longs than it has been making Playstation game consoles. Sony's high-end TVs are often regarded as the ultimate choice for videophiles, representing the epitome of quality, albeit at a premium price point. Renowned for their advanced and precise motion handling, as well as their cutting-edge local dimming algorithms, Sony consistently delivers unparalleled performance in these areas. They include Google TV software with all their TV sets, which grants access to the largest selection of apps available and they also include Bravia Core which is a movie streaming platform specifically for Sony TVs that offers higher picture quality by using more bandwidth.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
122,430
Recommendations made
18,365
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.