The LG B3 (OLED) will offer a more premium viewing experience with better picture quality over the Samsung Q60B (LCD), especially in darker environments due to OLED's superior contrast and deep blacks. However, OLED screens are more susceptible to burn-in with static images, a consideration if you plan on watching channels with static logos or play video games with fixed displays for extended periods. The Q60B, although less vibrant, is more durable in this respect and performs better in bright rooms due to its brighter screen. If cost is a significant factor, the Q60B provides a decent picture at a lower price. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG B3 (OLED)
Excellent for dark room
Very good for gaming
Excellent for movies & TV
Very good for sports
Very good for news, talk, & other TV
Very good for use as monitor
Very good motion processing
Best in class viewing angle
Excellent reflections
Advantages of the Samsung Q60B (LCD)
The Samsung Q60B (LCD) has no clear advantages over the LG B3 (OLED).
Key differences
Picture Quality
8.8/10
7.3/10
10/10
CONTRAST
7.75/10
8.1/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.2/10
WOLED
PANEL TYPE
LED
WBC
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
The LG B3 (OLED) has very good picture quality, while the Samsung Q60B (LCD) has good picture quality.
Movies & TV
9.2/10
6.6/10
10/10
CONTRAST
7.75/10
10.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
8.5/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
Yes
Yes
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
No
The LG B3 (OLED) is excellent for movies & TV, while the Samsung Q60B (LCD) is only fair.
The LG B3 OLED offers perfect black uniformity and excellent contrast due to its OLED technology, providing a superior movie and cinematic TV experience, especially in dark scenes. In contrast, the Samsung Q60B LCD, lacking local dimming, falls short in black uniformity and contrast, resulting in less impressive dark scene performance, albeit with vivid colors out of the box and good brightness for well-lit rooms.
Sports
8.3/10
6.4/10
8.0/10
MOTION PROCESSING
7.0/10
120Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
7.1/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.3/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG B3 (OLED) is very good for sports, while the Samsung Q60B (LCD) is only fair.
The LG B3 OLED has excellent response time and a 120Hz refresh rate, making it very good for watching sports as it can display fast-moving scenes smoothly and with less motion blur, whereas the Samsung Q60B LCD has a poor response time and a 60Hz refresh rate, which may result in more noticeable motion blur during fast sports action. Additionally, the LG B3 has better viewing angles and superior management of reflections, adding to its suitability for sports viewing in comparison to the Samsung Q60B which has fair performance in these areas.
Gaming
8.9/10
5.6/10
9.4/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
5.2/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
8.0/10
MOTION PROCESSING
7.0/10
100.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
0.0/100
7.5/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.9/10
The LG B3 (OLED) is very good for gaming, while the Samsung Q60B (LCD) is poor.
The LG B3 OLED TV is excellent for gaming due to its superior response time, ensuring smooth transitions in fast-paced games, and it also boasts the best input lag performance for quicker reactions. On the other hand, the Samsung Q60B LCD TV is considered poor for gaming because of its lower response time, which can lead to blur in quick-moving scenes, although it matches the LG B3 in providing the best input lag performance.
News, Talk, & Other TV
8.3/10
7.6/10
7.1/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.3/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
The LG B3 (OLED) is very good for news, talk, & other TV, while the Samsung Q60B (LCD) is good.
The LG B3 excels at upscaling lower-resolution content and delivers excellent out-of-the-box colors, making it very good for watching news and TV programs, all enhanced by its superior OLED contrast and wide viewing angles. In contrast, the Samsung Q60B offers very good SDR brightness, ensuring clear visibility in bright rooms, and its good colors out of the box alongside solid upscaling capabilities contribute to a satisfying experience when viewing standard TV content.
Cost
$998
$848
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The LG B3 (OLED) has a price of $998 and the Samsung Q60B (LCD) costs $848.
The LG B3 (OLED) and Samsung Q60B (LCD) are both very good for cartoons & animation.
The LG B3 OLED TV excels in displaying cartoons and animation because it offers superior color accuracy straight out of the box and a wider color gamut, ensuring vibrant and varied colors. In comparison, the Samsung Q60B LCD TV, while also very good for this content, may show limitations in color volume and gray uniformity, but still maintains good contrast and SDR brightness for animated scenes.
Bright Room
7.3/10
7.1/10
9.5/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.3/10
7.1/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.3/10
7.2/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.7/10
9.2/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
6.3/10
The LG B3 (OLED) and Samsung Q60B (LCD) are both good for bright room.
The LG B3 OLED TV is good for watching TV in a bright room due to its excellent handling of reflections and good SDR and HDR brightness. The Samsung Q60B LCD TV offers very good SDR brightness which helps in bright rooms, but it has fair reflection handling and only fair HDR brightness.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG B3 (OLED) and the Samsung Q60B (LCD) compare to other TVs
"Samsung's 2022 QLED workhorse shines in bright rooms and with HDR. The Samsung Q60B stands out from the slew of entry-level TVs with an ultra-thin frame, a skinny profile from the side and even narrow stand legs. The Q60B is a very good bright-room TV, and my subjective impression of its ample light output was proven by measurements."
Get a great deal on the LG B3 (OLED) or the Samsung Q60B (LCD)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
About Samsung
Samsung, a South Korean electronics manufacturer, holds the title of being the largest global TV vendor in terms of units sold. They offer a diverse lineup of TV products that cater to various budget ranges. A notable achievement in recent years is the development of Quantum Dots, a technology that enhances color reproduction, resulting in richer and more vibrant hues. Samsung TVs are well-regarded for their high manufacturing quality and user-friendly software, making them an excellent choice for consumers seeking an intuitive viewing experience.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
122,730
Recommendations made
18,410
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.