If you prioritize picture quality for movies and dark room viewing, the LG C1 OLED TV will provide deeper blacks and better contrast. However, it comes at a premium price and its screen is less bright, so it might not stand out as much in a very sunny room. In contrast, the LG NANO90 LCD TV is less expensive, has better brightness for sunny rooms, and offers good performance for sports and gaming. Nevertheless, its picture quality in dark environments and contrast won't match the C1's. Both TVs support important HDR formats and have similar sound quality and HDMI features. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO90 (LCD)
The LG NANO90 (LCD) has no clear advantages over the LG C1 (OLED).
Advantages of the LG C1 (OLED)
Good for bright room
Very good for dark room
Excellent for gaming
Very good for movies & TV
Very good for sports
Very good for news, talk, & other TV
Very good for cartoons & animation
Very good for use as monitor
Very good for upscaling
Very good motion processing
Excellent viewing angle
Excellent reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
6.1/10
8.5/10
5.28/10
CONTRAST
10.00/10
6.6/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.2/10
LED FALD
PANEL TYPE
WOLED
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
WBC
The LG C1 (OLED) has very good picture quality, while the LG NANO90 (LCD) has only fair picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.6/10
8.9/10
5.28/10
CONTRAST
10.00/10
5.3/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
Yes
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The LG C1 (OLED) is very good for movies & TV, while the LG NANO90 (LCD) is poor.
The LG C1 (OLED) excels in watching movies and cinematic TV due to its perfect blacks and contrast ratio, wide viewing angles, and excellent color performance straight out of the box. In contrast, the LG NANO90 (LCD) has a lower contrast ratio and black uniformity which can result in grayer blacks and a less immersive experience in dark scenes.
Sports
6.8/10
8.3/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
120Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
8.7/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
7.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.0/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG C1 (OLED) is very good for sports, while the LG NANO90 (LCD) is only fair.
The LG C1 has superior motion processing and reflection handling which makes it very good for watching sports, providing a clearer picture during fast action and better visibility in bright rooms. In contrast, the LG NANO90 performs at a fair level for sports viewing because it doesn't handle reflections or fast-moving images as well, leading to a less optimal experience.
Gaming
8.0/10
9.0/10
7.6/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
10.0/10
8.7/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
50.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
100.0/100
7.6/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.2/10
The LG C1 (OLED) is excellent for gaming, while the LG NANO90 (LCD) is very good.
The LG C1 OLED TV offers the best response time, meaning actions on-screen are almost instantaneous, perfect for fast-paced gaming, and it also has the lowest input lag, which ensures that commands from your controller are reflected on-screen without delay. Meanwhile, the LG NANO90 LCD TV has good response time and very good input lag, which is suitable for gaming, but it may not feel as seamless as the OLED offering, especially during high-speed gameplay.
Cartoons & Animation
5.6/10
8.2/10
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
8.1/10
6.6/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.2/10
7.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.0/10
4.3/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.2/10
5.9/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
9.6/10
The LG C1 (OLED) is very good for cartoons & animation, while the LG NANO90 (LCD) is poor.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.4/10
8.6/10
7.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
The LG C1 (OLED) is very good for news, talk, & other TV, while the LG NANO90 (LCD) is only fair.
Cost
$1,719
$1,349
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The LG NANO90 (LCD) has a price of $1,719 and the LG C1 (OLED) costs $1,349.
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG C1 (OLED) to be good for bright room, while the LG NANO90 (LCD) is only fair.
The LG C1 (OLED) is better for viewing in a bright room than the LG NANO90 (LCD) primarily because the OLED has superior handling of reflections and higher contrast, enhancing visibility in well-lit environments. The NANO90, while offering fair performance with a decent level of screen brightness and good reflection handling, falls short of the C1's excellent reflection management and perfect contrast ratio, making the latter a more suitable choice for bright rooms.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO90 (LCD) and the LG C1 (OLED) compare to other TVs
"Here we have HDR pictures that look bright, but also manage to typically hit decently deep black levels.WebOS continues, though, to be one of the easiest to use. Connections are strong for a mid-range TV. Native 4K pictures look crisp and detailed."
Get a great deal on the LG NANO90 (LCD) or the LG C1 (OLED)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
122,430
Recommendations made
18,365
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.