A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec TV team Learn more
Updated January 10, 2024·
The LG NANO75 is less expensive and could be appealing if you are on a budget. It has a good sports content viewing experience but is not ideal for dark rooms. The TCL R648 is pricier but offers better overall picture quality and a superior gaming experience. It also performs well in bright rooms and has better sound, but it may not be as good of a value if you're looking to save money. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
- Good for upscaling
- Good motion processing
Advantages of the TCL R648 (LCD)
- Very good for bright room
- Good for dark room
- Very good for gaming
- Good for movies & TV
- Good for news, talk, & other TV
- Very good for cartoons & animation
- Good for use as monitor
- Very good reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
5.6
7.7
4.97/10
CONTRAST
7.00/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.6/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
miniLED FALD
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
The TCL R648 (LCD) has good picture quality, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2
7.6
4.97/10
CONTRAST
7.00/10
5.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
6.5/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
5.9/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The TCL R648 (LCD) is good for movies & TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 struggles with movie and cinematic TV viewing due to its lower contrast and absence of local dimming which results in poor black uniformity, while the TCL R648 is favored for these uses because it has higher contrast, effective local dimming, and better black uniformity. Additionally, despite both TVs having comparable viewing angles, the TCL R648's colors out of the box and color volume are superior to those of the LG NANO75, enhancing the overall viewing experience for movies and cinematic content.
Gaming
5.7
8.2
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
8.2/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
7.6/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
5.3/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
70.0/100
5.7/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.3/10
The TCL R648 (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The TCL R648 has a very good response time and good input lag, which makes it responsive and suitable for fast-paced gaming, while the LG NANO75 has only fair response time and the best input lag, which may be less optimal for highly responsive gaming despite its low input delay.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9
8.6
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
7.8/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.6/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.0/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
9.0/10
6.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
7.0/10
The TCL R648 (LCD) is very good for cartoons & animation, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The TCL R648 has excellent colors right out of the box and a good color gamut, which means it displays a wide and accurate range of colors, making animation look vibrant and appealing. In contrast, the LG NANO75 shows colors that are just good out of the box and has a fair color gamut along with poor color volume, leading to less vibrant cartoons and animation.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.1
7.5
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
5.9/10
The TCL R648 (LCD) is good for news, talk, & other TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is only fair.
The TCL R648 has better SDR brightness and color performance out of the box compared to the LG NANO75, making it better for watching news and TV programs in rooms with varying light conditions and for viewers who prefer more accurate colors without having to calibrate their TV. However, the LG NANO75 has better upscaling quality, which can make standard definition content appear clearer, a benefit if you often watch channels that are not broadcast in high definition.
Bright Room
5.8
8.1
6.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.2/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.0/10
5.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.9/10
7.8/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
8.0/10
The TCL R648 (LCD) is very good for bright room, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The TCL R648 has excellent SDR and good HDR brightness, making it very suitable for bright rooms, and it also handles reflections very well. On the other hand, the LG NANO75 struggles with lower brightness in both SDR and HDR content and has only good reflection handling, making it less ideal for bright environments.
Cost
$900
$2,000
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has a price of $900 and the TCL R648 (LCD) costs $2,000.
Let Us Help Find Your Perfect TV
Find your new TV
Key similarities
Sports
6.7
6.5
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
5.3/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
7.6/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
5.9/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.0/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and TCL R648 (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The LG NANO75 has a fair response time and good motion processing which are important for watching sports, but it has a wide viewing angle and is less effective at handling reflections which can detract from the experience in well-lit rooms. The TCL R648, on the other hand, has a very good response time and fair motion processing, but offers a narrower viewing angle and better handling of reflections, making it a more suitable choice for darker environments.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO75 (LCD) and the TCL R648 (LCD) compare to other TVs
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| LG NANO75 (LCD) | TCL R648 (LCD) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$900 | $2,000 | ||
Brand | |||
Brand | LG | TCL | |
Release Date | |||
Release Date | March 4, 2022 | May 1, 2021 | |
Full name | |||
Full name | 65NANO75 | 65R648 | |
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 65" | 65" | |
Screen Resolution | |||
Screen Resolution | 4K | 8K | |
TV FEATURES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Operating System | |||
Operating System | webOS | Roku TV | |
Sound Quality Score | |||
Sound Quality Score | 6.1/10 | 8/10 | |
NextGen Ready | |||
NextGen Ready | No | No | |
HDMI Ports | |||
HDMI Ports | 3 | 4 | |
Coax Ports | |||
Coax Ports | 1 | 1 | |
DISPLAY QUALITY SCORES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Picture Quality Score | |||
Picture Quality Score | 5.7/10 | 7.8/10 | |
Bright Room Score | |||
Bright Room Score | 5.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
Gaming Score | |||
Gaming Score | 5.7/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Movies & TV Score | |||
Movies & TV Score | 5.3/10 | 7.7/10 | |
Sports Score | |||
Sports Score | 6.7/10 | 6.6/10 | |
PHYSICAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | |||
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | 33" x 57.2" x 2.3" | 32.7" x 57" x 3" | |
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | |||
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | 35.4" x 57.2" | 35.1" x 57" | |
Weight without Stand | |||
Weight without Stand | 49.8 lbs | 70.1 lbs | |
VESA Mount | |||
VESA Mount | 300 x 300 | 400 x 400 | |
DISPLAY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Color Depth | |||
Color Depth | 10 bit | 10 bit | |
Black Frame Insertion | |||
Black Frame Insertion | No | Yes | |
Auto Low Latency Mode | |||
Auto Low Latency Mode | Yes | Yes | |
Contrast | |||
Contrast | 5/10 | 7/10 | |
Local Dimming | |||
Local Dimming | 2.5/10 | 6.5/10 | |
SOUND | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Speaker Setup | |||
Speaker Setup | 2.0 | 2.1 | |
Speaker Power | |||
Speaker Power | 20 W | 50 W | |
Dolby Atmos | |||
Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes | |
DTS:X | |||
DTS:X | No | Yes, Bypass only | |
Get a great deal on the LG NANO75 (LCD) or the TCL R648 (LCD)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
About TCL
TCL, the highly recognizable TV brand from China, has firmly established itself as the second-largest manufacturer in terms of sales volume. Renowned for striking an impressive balance between affordability, picture quality, and design, TCL TVs deliver a compelling overall package. While they have traditionally excelled in the low-end and midrange TV segments, TCL has recently made remarkable strides in the realm of high-end televisions, introducing impressive models that rival top competitors. Most TCL TVs use Roku software which is very user friendly and easy to use, but they have a few other models that use Google TV which has the largest app selection, but is not as user friendly as Roku.
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
TV guides you might be interested in
More comparisons for you
FAQs
FAQs about TVs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
122,430
Recommendations made
18,365
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.
Featured in
