The LG NANO75 is a lower midrange priced TV, offering a decent overall picture quality with a particularly good performance for viewing sports content. It will not perform as well in a dark room, and its bright room performance is average. For gaming, it's suitable but not exceptional.
On the other hand, the TCL R646 costs more but delivers better overall picture quality, excels at gaming with high responsiveness and low input lag, and has superior dark room performance. It also handles bright room conditions very well.
If budget is a major consideration and sports content viewing is a priority, LG NANO75 may be more appropriate. For a better gaming experience and higher quality in both bright and dark environments, the TCL R646 would be a better choice despite the higher price. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
Good for upscaling
Good motion processing
Advantages of the TCL R646 (LCD)
Very good for bright room
Good for dark room
Very good for gaming
Good for movies & TV
Good for news, talk, & other TV
Very good for cartoons & animation
Good for use as monitor
Very good reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
5.6/10
7.9/10
4.97/10
CONTRAST
8.43/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.6/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
miniLED FALD
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
The TCL R646 (LCD) has good picture quality, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2/10
7.8/10
4.97/10
CONTRAST
8.43/10
5.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
6.8/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
5.9/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
Yes
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The TCL R646 (LCD) is good for movies & TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
Gaming
5.7/10
8.2/10
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
8.0/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
7.6/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
5.3/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
70.0/100
5.7/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.7/10
The TCL R646 (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9/10
8.4/10
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
7.6/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.6/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.1/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.2/10
6.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
8.0/10
The TCL R646 (LCD) is very good for cartoons & animation, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
When watching cartoons and animation, the TCL R646 outperforms the LG NANO75 due to the R646's superior color gamut and volume, making colors appear more vivid and accurate. Additionally, the R646 delivers better contrast and brightness, which are beneficial for animation, while the NANO75 falls short in these areas, leading to less vibrant and flat images.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.1/10
7.5/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.1/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
5.9/10
The TCL R646 (LCD) is good for news, talk, & other TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is only fair.
The LG NANO75 has poor upscaling and SDR brightness performance, which might not provide the clearest picture for watching news and TV programs, but its wide viewing angles would be advantageous in a room where viewers are seated off to the side. On the other hand, the TCL R646 has excellent SDR brightness and better quality local dimming, which contributes to sharper and more vibrant images, making it a better choice for viewing content directly in front, but its viewing angles are more limited.
Bright Room
5.8/10
8.9/10
6.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.3/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.1/10
5.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.3/10
7.8/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
8.1/10
The TCL R646 (LCD) is very good for bright room, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 struggles in bright rooms due to its poor SDR and HDR brightness and only good reflections handling, while the TCL R646 excels in these environments with its excellent SDR brightness, very good HDR brightness, and very good reflections handling, meaning it maintains picture quality even in well-lit spaces. Contrast, color volume, and color gamut are also factors, where the TCL R646 performs better overall, affecting how vibrant and deep the picture appears.
Cost
$900
$800
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has a price of $900 and the TCL R646 (LCD) costs $800.
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and TCL R646 (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The LG NANO75 has a fair response time and motion processing, which are very important for watching sports, and its reflection handling is good, but it has a wider viewing angle, which can be beneficial for larger groups. The TCL R646, while having a very good response time that is beneficial for fast motion in sports, falls short with only a fair motion processing performance and has a lower reflection handling score and narrower viewing angles compared to the LG NANO75. Both TVs exhibit only fair gray uniformity, which is somewhat important and can affect the viewing experience when watching sports.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO75 (LCD) and the TCL R646 (LCD) compare to other TVs
Spec Comparison
LG NANO75 (LCD)
TCL R646 (LCD)
GENERAL
Price
Price
$900
$800
Brand
Brand
LG
TCL
Release Date
Release Date
March 4, 2022
August 2, 2021
Full name
Full name
65NANO75
65R646
Screen Size
Screen Size
65"
65"
Screen Resolution
Screen Resolution
4K
4K
Screen Type
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Screen Sub-type
Screen Sub-type
LED IPS
miniLED FALD VA
Smart TV
Smart TV
Yes
Yes
TV FEATURES
Operating System
Operating System
webOS
Android TV
Sound Quality Score
Sound Quality Score
6.1/10
10/10
NextGen Ready
NextGen Ready
No
No
HDMI Ports
HDMI Ports
3
4
Coax Ports
Coax Ports
1
1
Refresh Rate
Refresh Rate
60Hz
120Hz
Variable Refresh Rate
Variable Refresh Rate
No
Yes
HDR Supported formats
HDR Supported formats
HDR10, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Accessibility
Accessibility
None
None
DISPLAY QUALITY SCORES
Picture Quality Score
Picture Quality Score
5.7/10
7.9/10
Bright Room Score
Bright Room Score
5.8/10
9/10
Gaming Score
Gaming Score
5.7/10
8.2/10
Movies & TV Score
Movies & TV Score
5.3/10
7.8/10
Sports Score
Sports Score
6.7/10
6.6/10
News, Talk, & Other TV Score
News, Talk, & Other TV Score
6.2/10
7.5/10
Cartoons & Animation Score
Cartoons & Animation Score
6/10
8.4/10
Use as Monitor Score
Use as Monitor Score
6.6/10
7.3/10
PHYSICAL
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D)
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D)
33" x 57.2" x 2.3"
33.3" x 56.9" x 3.6"
Dimensions with Stand (H x W)
Dimensions with Stand (H x W)
35.4" x 57.2"
35.7" x 56.9"
Weight without Stand
Weight without Stand
49.8 lbs
63.5 lbs
VESA Mount
VESA Mount
300 x 300
300 x 300
DISPLAY
Color Depth
Color Depth
10 bit
10 bit
Black Frame Insertion
Black Frame Insertion
No
Yes
Auto Low Latency Mode
Auto Low Latency Mode
Yes
Yes
Contrast
Contrast
5/10
8.4/10
Local Dimming
Local Dimming
2.5/10
6.5/10
Gaming Local Dimming
Gaming Local Dimming
0/100
7/100
Game HDR Brightness Score
Game HDR Brightness Score
5.8/10
8.8/10
SDR Brightness Score
SDR Brightness Score
5.8/10
9.1/10
HDR Brightness Score
HDR Brightness Score
5.6/10
8.4/10
Gray Uniformity
Gray Uniformity
6/10
8/10
Black Uniformity
Black Uniformity
5.1/10
6.9/10
Viewing Angle
Viewing Angle
6.8/10
5.3/10
Reflections Score
Reflections Score
7.9/10
8.1/10
Upscaling
Upscaling
7.5/10
5.9/10
Motion Processing
Motion Processing
7.5/10
5.3/10
Color Gamut Score
Color Gamut Score
6.6/10
7.7/10
Color Volume Score
Color Volume Score
5.9/10
7.7/10
Response Time Score
Response Time Score
6.1/10
8.1/10
Input Lag Score
Input Lag Score
10/10
7.7/10
Colors Out of the Box Score
Colors Out of the Box Score
7.7/10
7.3/10
Quality Control
Quality Control
7/10
7/10
Chroma Subsampling Score
Chroma Subsampling Score
7/10
7.5/10
SOUND
Speaker Setup
Speaker Setup
2.0
2.0
Speaker Power
Speaker Power
20 W
30 W
Dolby Atmos
Dolby Atmos
Yes
Yes
DTS:X
DTS:X
No
Yes, Bypass only
Get a great deal on the LG NANO75 (LCD) or the TCL R646 (LCD)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
About TCL
TCL, the highly recognizable TV brand from China, has firmly established itself as the second-largest manufacturer in terms of sales volume. Renowned for striking an impressive balance between affordability, picture quality, and design, TCL TVs deliver a compelling overall package. While they have traditionally excelled in the low-end and midrange TV segments, TCL has recently made remarkable strides in the realm of high-end televisions, introducing impressive models that rival top competitors. Most TCL TVs use Roku software which is very user friendly and easy to use, but they have a few other models that use Google TV which has the largest app selection, but is not as user friendly as Roku.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
121,530
Recommendations made
18,230
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.