The LG NANO75 is less expensive and offers satisfactory performance for sports content with better viewing angles due to its IPS screen, making it suitable for wide seating. But, it is not as good in dark rooms and has lower overall picture quality.
The TCL QM8 costs more but provides significantly superior picture quality, especially in dark rooms and for High Dynamic Range (HDR) content. It's also better for gaming with its higher refresh rate and has better contrast due to its VA screen. However, its narrower viewing angles may not be ideal for wide seating arrangements. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
Good for upscaling
Good motion processing
Advantages of the TCL QM8 (LCD)
Best in class for bright room
Very good for dark room
Very good for gaming
Very good for movies & TV
Very good for cartoons & animation
Good for use as monitor
Very good reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
5.6/10
8.5/10
4.97/10
CONTRAST
8.00/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
9.2/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
miniLED FALD
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
The TCL QM8 (LCD) has very good picture quality, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2/10
8.3/10
4.97/10
CONTRAST
8.00/10
5.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
8.5/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
4.8/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
Yes
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The TCL QM8 (LCD) is very good for movies & TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 has poor local dimming and black uniformity, leading to lower contrast and affecting its movie-watching performance, whereas the TCL QM8 offers excellent contrast, local dimming, and black uniformity, providing a superior cinematic experience. Additionally, the TCL QM8 presents better out-of-the-box colors and a wider color volume, which further enhances its capability to display movies and cinematic content.
Gaming
5.7/10
8.3/10
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
8.1/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
7.6/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
4.6/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
90.0/100
5.7/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.3/10
The TCL QM8 (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75's fair response time and best input lag make it less ideal for gaming compared to the TCL QM8, which has very good response time and good input lag, providing a smoother gaming experience with minimal delay between user actions and on-screen reaction.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9/10
8.9/10
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
8.1/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
9.2/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
10.0/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.6/10
6.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
7.5/10
The TCL QM8 (LCD) is very good for cartoons & animation, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75's colors out of the box are rated as good, but it falls short in color gamut, which is essential for delivering the full spectrum of colors in cartoons and animation, whereas the TCL QM8 not only delivers good colors out of the box but also has a very good color gamut ensuring richer and more accurate colors for animated content. Additionally, the TCL QM8 has excellent color volume which helps to maintain those colors across different brightness levels, whereas the LG NANO75 has a poor color volume, affecting its ability to do the same.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.1/10
6.8/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
4.8/10
The TCL QM8 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both only fair for news, talk, & other TV, though the TCL QM8 (LCD) is somewhat better.
The LG NANO75 performs decently in upscaling lower resolution content and offers good colors out of the box, which are important for viewing news and TV programs, but it has poor SDR brightness and lacks local dimming that can affect its picture quality in well-lit rooms. In contrast, the TCL QM8 stands out with its excellent SDR brightness and effective local dimming, enhancing visibility in various lighting conditions, but it has lower performance in upscaling and colors out of the box, which may require additional adjustment for optimal viewing.
Bright Room
5.8/10
9.9/10
6.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.3/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
10.0/10
5.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.3/10
7.8/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
8.9/10
The TCL QM8 (LCD) is best in class for bright room, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The TCL QM8 is best for a bright room primarily because it offers superior reflections handling and exceptional HDR brightness, ensuring clear visibility even in well-lit environments. On the other hand, the LG NANO75 struggles in bright rooms due to its poorer reflections handling and lackluster HDR brightness, which can result in a washed-out picture when exposed to ambient light.
Cost
$900
$1,498
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has a price of $900 and the TCL QM8 (LCD) costs $1,498.
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and TCL QM8 (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The LG NANO75 has a wider viewing angle which is beneficial for watching sports with friends, but its response time and motion processing are only fair, meaning some viewers may notice blurring during fast-paced games. Conversely, the TCL QM8 has very good response time, offering sharper motion, but it has a narrower viewing angle, so the picture quality might diminish when viewed from the side; both models perform well in managing reflections, but the TCL QM8 has a slight edge in this area..
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO75 (LCD) and the TCL QM8 (LCD) compare to other TVs
Spec Comparison
LG NANO75 (LCD)
TCL QM8 (LCD)
GENERAL
Price
Price
$900
$1,498
Brand
Brand
LG
TCL
Release Date
Release Date
March 4, 2022
May 1, 2023
Full name
Full name
65NANO75
65QM850G
Screen Size
Screen Size
65"
65"
Screen Resolution
Screen Resolution
4K
4K
Screen Type
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Screen Sub-type
Screen Sub-type
LED IPS
miniLED FALD VA
Smart TV
Smart TV
Yes
Yes
TV FEATURES
Operating System
Operating System
webOS
Google TV
Sound Quality Score
Sound Quality Score
6.1/10
7/10
NextGen Ready
NextGen Ready
No
No
HDMI Ports
HDMI Ports
3
4
Coax Ports
Coax Ports
1
1
Refresh Rate
Refresh Rate
60Hz
120Hz
Variable Refresh Rate
Variable Refresh Rate
No
Yes
HDR Supported formats
HDR Supported formats
HDR10, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Accessibility
Accessibility
None
Voice Commands
DISPLAY QUALITY SCORES
Picture Quality Score
Picture Quality Score
5.7/10
8.6/10
Bright Room Score
Bright Room Score
5.8/10
9.9/10
Gaming Score
Gaming Score
5.7/10
8.4/10
Movies & TV Score
Movies & TV Score
5.3/10
8.3/10
Sports Score
Sports Score
6.7/10
6.6/10
News, Talk, & Other TV Score
News, Talk, & Other TV Score
6.2/10
6.9/10
Cartoons & Animation Score
Cartoons & Animation Score
6/10
8.9/10
Use as Monitor Score
Use as Monitor Score
6.6/10
8/10
PHYSICAL
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D)
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D)
33" x 57.2" x 2.3"
32.6" x 56.9" x 1.7"
Dimensions with Stand (H x W)
Dimensions with Stand (H x W)
35.4" x 57.2"
34.1" x 56.9"
Weight without Stand
Weight without Stand
49.8 lbs
50.1 lbs
VESA Mount
VESA Mount
300 x 300
300 x 400
DISPLAY
Color Depth
Color Depth
10 bit
10 bit
Black Frame Insertion
Black Frame Insertion
No
Yes
Auto Low Latency Mode
Auto Low Latency Mode
Yes
Yes
Contrast
Contrast
5/10
8/10
Local Dimming
Local Dimming
2.5/10
8/10
Gaming Local Dimming
Gaming Local Dimming
0/100
9/100
Game HDR Brightness Score
Game HDR Brightness Score
5.8/10
9.4/10
SDR Brightness Score
SDR Brightness Score
5.8/10
10/10
HDR Brightness Score
HDR Brightness Score
5.6/10
9.3/10
Gray Uniformity
Gray Uniformity
6/10
7.5/10
Black Uniformity
Black Uniformity
5.1/10
8.5/10
Viewing Angle
Viewing Angle
6.8/10
5.4/10
Reflections Score
Reflections Score
7.9/10
9/10
Upscaling
Upscaling
7.5/10
4.8/10
Motion Processing
Motion Processing
7.5/10
4.6/10
Color Gamut Score
Color Gamut Score
6.6/10
8.2/10
Color Volume Score
Color Volume Score
5.9/10
9.3/10
Response Time Score
Response Time Score
6.1/10
8.2/10
Input Lag Score
Input Lag Score
10/10
7.7/10
Colors Out of the Box Score
Colors Out of the Box Score
7.7/10
7.6/10
Quality Control
Quality Control
7/10
6.3/10
Chroma Subsampling Score
Chroma Subsampling Score
7/10
10/10
SOUND
Speaker Setup
Speaker Setup
2.0
2.1
Speaker Power
Speaker Power
20 W
40 W
Dolby Atmos
Dolby Atmos
Yes
Yes
DTS:X
DTS:X
No
Yes, Bypass only
Get a great deal on the LG NANO75 (LCD) or the TCL QM8 (LCD)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
About TCL
TCL, the highly recognizable TV brand from China, has firmly established itself as the second-largest manufacturer in terms of sales volume. Renowned for striking an impressive balance between affordability, picture quality, and design, TCL TVs deliver a compelling overall package. While they have traditionally excelled in the low-end and midrange TV segments, TCL has recently made remarkable strides in the realm of high-end televisions, introducing impressive models that rival top competitors. Most TCL TVs use Roku software which is very user friendly and easy to use, but they have a few other models that use Google TV which has the largest app selection, but is not as user friendly as Roku.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
122,430
Recommendations made
18,365
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.