The LG NANO75 is often significantly more expensive and has an IPS panel, which offers wider viewing angles but may not provide as deep blacks as VA panels. This might make it a better choice for rooms with wide seating arrangements but not ideal for dark room viewing. Consider these differences along with the importance of cost and viewing conditions to make your decision. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
Good for upscaling
Good motion processing
Good reflections
Advantages of the TCL Q6 (LCD)
Good for bright room
Key differences
Picture Quality
5.6/10
6.9/10
4.97/10
CONTRAST
5.64/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.5/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
LED
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
The TCL Q6 (LCD) has only fair picture quality, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2/10
5.9/10
4.97/10
CONTRAST
5.64/10
5.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
9.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
6.3/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
Yes
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The TCL Q6 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both poor for movies & TV, though the TCL Q6 (LCD) is somewhat better.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9/10
6.6/10
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
7.3/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.5/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.1/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
5.8/10
6.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
6.2/10
The TCL Q6 (LCD) is only fair for cartoons & animation, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 struggles with cartoons and animations primarily due to its limited color volume and fair color gamut, which impacts the richness and accuracy of colors. In comparison, the TCL Q6 delivers a fair rendition of cartoons and animations as it has a good color gamut and color volume, but still has limitations in color performance out of the box.
Bright Room
5.8/10
7.2/10
6.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.4/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.1/10
5.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.6/10
7.8/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
5.9/10
The TCL Q6 (LCD) is good for bright room, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 struggles with displays in bright rooms due to its poor SDR and HDR brightness levels and just good reflection handling, whereas the TCL Q6 excels in these conditions with its very good SDR brightness, good HDR brightness, and despite its fair reflection handling, it overall performs better in well-lit environments.
Cost
$900
$700
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has a price of $900 and the TCL Q6 (LCD) costs $700.
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and TCL Q6 (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The LG NANO75 handles reflections better and offers wider viewing angles which is beneficial when watching sports with a group, but its motion processing and response time are mediocre, leading to potential blurring during fast action. The TCL Q6, on the other hand, has a poor reflection handling which can be distracting in brightly lit rooms, and although its gray uniformity is similar to the LG's, its poor viewing angles might limit the view for those sitting off to the side.
Gaming
5.7/10
5.8/10
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
6.4/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
4.6/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
19.0/100
5.7/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.1/10
The TCL Q6 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both poor for gaming.
The LG NANO75 and TCL Q6 have less than ideal response times for gaming, meaning there can be a noticeable blur during fast-moving scenes. Despite this, both have low input lag, ensuring that players' actions are displayed quickly on the screen, but their 60Hz refresh rate does not provide as smooth an experience as higher refresh rate TVs.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.1/10
6.2/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.1/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
6.3/10
The TCL Q6 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both only fair for news, talk, & other TV.
Both the LG NANO75 and the TCL Q6 are fair for watching news and TV programs due to their capability to upscale content from lower resolutions to fit their high-definition screens, which is important when viewing standard-definition TV broadcasts. However, the LG NANO75 has a lower contrast and SDR brightness, which can make images look less vivid, especially in brightly lit rooms, while the TCL Q6 offers better SDR brightness, making it more suitable for well-lit environments, and a better color gamut, allowing for a wider range of colors and more life-like image representation.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO75 (LCD) and the TCL Q6 (LCD) compare to other TVs
"If you’re looking for a good overall viewing experience without spending a lot, the TCL Q6 fits the bill. With its good color reproduction, the image on the screen will do just fine, especially for HDR content."
Get a great deal on the LG NANO75 (LCD) or the TCL Q6 (LCD)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
About TCL
TCL, the highly recognizable TV brand from China, has firmly established itself as the second-largest manufacturer in terms of sales volume. Renowned for striking an impressive balance between affordability, picture quality, and design, TCL TVs deliver a compelling overall package. While they have traditionally excelled in the low-end and midrange TV segments, TCL has recently made remarkable strides in the realm of high-end televisions, introducing impressive models that rival top competitors. Most TCL TVs use Roku software which is very user friendly and easy to use, but they have a few other models that use Google TV which has the largest app selection, but is not as user friendly as Roku.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
122,430
Recommendations made
18,365
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.