Updated January 10, 2024·Prices updated 24 hours ago
When considering the LG NANO75 and the Samsung CU8000, both are similarly priced and offer quite different experiences. If you tend to watch in a bright room and enjoy vibrant colors, the LG NANO75 could be the better option thanks to its IPS screen. However, for darker room viewing where black levels are important, the Samsung CU8000, with its VA panel, would be more suitable. For avid gamers, neither TV excels with high-frame-rate gaming, as both models have 60Hz panels. The Samsung model includes voice command features, which could be convenient if you like using voice control. Both TVs will provide a 4k resolution with similar connectivity options. Ultimately, choose the LG NANO75 for brighter rooms and better color reproduction or the Samsung CU8000 for better performance in darker environments and additional voice control capabilities. Give Feedback
This comparison is based on the 65" LG NANO75 (LCD) and the 65" Samsung CU8000 (LCD). At the time of writing the 65" LG NANO75 (LCD) cost $647 and the 65" Samsung CU8000 (LCD) cost $628.
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
Good for upscaling
Good reflections
Advantages of the Samsung CU8000 (LCD)
Very good motion processing
Key differences
Cost
$900
$578
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has a price of $900 and the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) costs $578.
The Samsung CU8000 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) both have poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2/10
5.3/10
4.97/10
CONTRAST
4.92/10
5.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
6.1/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
6.0/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
Yes
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
No
The Samsung CU8000 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both poor for movies & TV.
The LG NANO75 has low contrast, lacks local dimming, and fares poorly in black uniformity, which makes dark scenes in movies and cinematic content appear washed out rather than deep and immersive. Similarly, the Samsung CU8000 also suffers from low contrast and poor black uniformity, has no local dimming feature, and has subpar viewing angles, which can lead to a less satisfying movie-watching experience, especially in a dark room or when viewed from the side.
Sports
6.7/10
6.4/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.2/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.7/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
6.0/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.7/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and Samsung CU8000 (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The LG NANO75 exhibits fair response time, which is beneficial for watching sports as it reduces motion blur, while its good reflection handling helps maintain picture quality in bright rooms despite its limited viewing angle. On the other hand, the Samsung CU8000 also offers fair response time ensuring smooth motion during sports, but poor reflection handling might impact viewing in well-lit environments; however, it has better motion processing which is advantageous for fast-paced sports action.
Gaming
5.7/10
5.5/10
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
4.9/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.7/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.2/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
0.0/100
5.7/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.8/10
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and Samsung CU8000 (LCD) are both poor for gaming.
The LG NANO75 has a fair response time and best input lag, making it responsive for gaming, but its poor contrast could result in less vivid graphics. The Samsung CU8000 also has a fair response time and very good input lag, yet similarly struggles with poor contrast and lacks a high refresh rate, which can make fast-paced games less smooth.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9/10
5.9/10
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
7.3/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
6.9/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.7/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
6.2/10
6.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
6.6/10
The Samsung CU8000 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both poor for cartoons & animation.
The LG NANO75 has good colors out of the box, but a fair color gamut and poor color volume, which affects the vibrancy and accuracy of colors when watching cartoons and animations. Similarly, the Samsung CU8000 has fair colors out of the box and color volume, but its good color gamut is not enough to compensate for other weaknesses, leading to less than ideal performance for animation content.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.1/10
5.7/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.7/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
6.0/10
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG NANO75 (LCD) to be only fair for news, talk, & other TV, while the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 is better for watching news and talk shows because it has superior upscaling capabilities that enhance lower resolution content and displays colors more accurately right out of the box, making it more suitable for typical TV programs. Conversely, the Samsung CU8000 falls short in both upscaling and initial color accuracy, which may result in a less clear picture and less vibrant colors for standard TV content, despite both models having similar SDR brightness and contrast levels.
Bright Room
5.8/10
5.9/10
6.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.2/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.7/10
5.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.5/10
7.8/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
5.9/10
The Samsung CU8000 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both poor for bright room.
The LG NANO75 and Samsung CU8000 both underperform in bright rooms due to their poor SDR and HDR brightness and lack of local dimming, which prevents them from producing vibrant images under bright lights. Moreover, the LG NANO75, while handling reflections better than the Samsung CU8000, still struggles with glare, contributing to their subpar performance in well-lit environments.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO75 (LCD) and the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) compare to other TVs
Get a great deal on the LG NANO75 (LCD) or the Samsung CU8000 (LCD)
Perfectrec constantly monitors the prices from 3 retailers and sends you a weekly update.
Only the products you care about. No spam.
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
About Samsung
Samsung, a South Korean electronics manufacturer, holds the title of being the largest global TV vendor in terms of units sold. They offer a diverse lineup of TV products that cater to various budget ranges. A notable achievement in recent years is the development of Quantum Dots, a technology that enhances color reproduction, resulting in richer and more vibrant hues. Samsung TVs are well-regarded for their high manufacturing quality and user-friendly software, making them an excellent choice for consumers seeking an intuitive viewing experience.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
155,730
Recommendations made
23,360
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.