A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec TV team Learn more
Updated January 10, 2024·
The LG NANO75 typically costs more but offers better sports content viewing, a wider viewing angle, better reflection handling, and superior colors out of the box. It also performs slightly better for cartoons and animation. However, it struggles more in dark rooms than the Samsung CU7000. In contrast, the Samsung CU7000 is generally less expensive and performs better in dark rooms. It has higher contrast and comes with a few more smart features, like voice commands and support for HDR10+. The Samsung is also slightly better for gaming. If you watch a lot of sports or shows in brighter rooms, and value wider viewing angles and vibrant colors, the LG NANO75 would be preferable. On the other hand, if you're looking for better performance in darker environments, are a frequent gamer, and want to save some money while still having a good TV experience, the Samsung CU7000 might be the better choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
- Good for upscaling
- Good reflections
Advantages of the Samsung CU7000 (LCD)
- Very good motion processing
Key differences
Picture Quality
5.6
6.2
4.97/10
CONTRAST
5.82/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
5.6/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
LED
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
The Samsung CU7000 (LCD) has only fair picture quality, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2
5.8
4.97/10
CONTRAST
5.82/10
5.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
6.6/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
6.6/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
Yes
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
No
The Samsung CU7000 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both poor for movies & TV, though the Samsung CU7000 (LCD) is somewhat better.
The LG NANO75 has poor contrast, no local dimming, and weak black uniformity, which leads to less detailed dark scenes crucial for movies and cinematic TV, whereas the Samsung CU7000, although it has better contrast and black uniformity, the absence of effective local dimming and its fair viewing angles compromise the image quality in dark and wide-seating scenarios.
Cost
$900
$428
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has a price of $900 and the Samsung CU7000 (LCD) costs $428.
Let Us Help Find Your Perfect TV
Find your new TV
Key similarities
Sports
6.7
6.6
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.7/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
6.6/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.2/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and Samsung CU7000 (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The LG NANO75 has a good reflections handling and wide viewing angles which are beneficial for sports watching in a room with multiple viewers. However, it has only fair response time and motion processing, and lower gray uniformity, which can be drawbacks for fast-paced sports action. The Samsung CU7000, on the other hand, has poor reflections handling and a more limited viewing angle but offers better gray uniformity; unfortunately, it also shares the fair response time and motion processing, similarly affecting viewing clarity during fast movements.
Gaming
5.7
6.0
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
6.5/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.7/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
30.0/100
5.7/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.9/10
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Samsung CU7000 (LCD) to be only fair for gaming, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 has a "fair" response time and the best input lag, which makes it less suited for fast-paced gaming that requires quick screen transitions. On the other hand, the Samsung CU7000 also has a "fair" response time but a "very good" input lag, offering a slightly better experience for reactive gaming despite the similarly average response time.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9
5.7
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
5.9/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
5.6/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.2/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
6.0/10
6.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
6.0/10
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and Samsung CU7000 (LCD) are both poor for cartoons & animation.
The LG NANO75 and Samsung CU7000 both have subpar color performance important for cartoons and animation, with the LG having just fair color gamut and poor color volume, while the Samsung has poor scores in both, leading to less vibrant and accurate colors. Additionally, the Samsung's gray uniformity is on par with LG's, but its better contrast may not compensate for the overall inferior color reproduction when watching animated content.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.1
6.0
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.2/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
6.6/10
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and Samsung CU7000 (LCD) are both only fair for news, talk, & other TV.
The LG NANO75 is fair for watching news and TV programs, with good upscaling and colors out of the box, making standard content appear clear and vibrant; however, it has a fair color gamut. Meanwhile, the Samsung CU7000 also offers fair performance for the same content, with decent upscaling and a somewhat better contrast, but it falls short with poorer colors out of the box and a similar color gamut limitation.
Bright Room
5.8
5.8
6.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.3/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.2/10
5.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.4/10
7.8/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
5.9/10
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and Samsung CU7000 (LCD) are both poor for bright room.
The LG NANO75 struggles in bright rooms mainly due to its poor SDR and HDR brightness and only good handling of reflections, while the Samsung CU7000, despite a better SDR brightness performance, also suffers due to poor HDR brightness and handling of reflections. Both TVs are disadvantaged by their limited contrast, color volume, and color gamut, affecting the overall picture quality in well-lit environments.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO75 (LCD) and the Samsung CU7000 (LCD) compare to other TVs
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| LG NANO75 (LCD) | Samsung CU7000 (LCD) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$900 | $428 | ||
Brand | |||
Brand | LG | Samsung | |
Release Date | |||
Release Date | March 4, 2022 | April 5, 2023 | |
Full name | |||
Full name | 65NANO75 | UN65CU7000 | |
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 65" | 65" | |
Screen Resolution | |||
Screen Resolution | 4K | 4K | |
TV FEATURES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Operating System | |||
Operating System | webOS | Tizen | |
Sound Quality Score | |||
Sound Quality Score | 6.1/10 | 5.9/10 | |
NextGen Ready | |||
NextGen Ready | No | No | |
HDMI Ports | |||
HDMI Ports | 3 | 3 | |
Coax Ports | |||
Coax Ports | 1 | 1 | |
DISPLAY QUALITY SCORES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Picture Quality Score | |||
Picture Quality Score | 5.7/10 | 6.2/10 | |
Bright Room Score | |||
Bright Room Score | 5.8/10 | 5.8/10 | |
Gaming Score | |||
Gaming Score | 5.7/10 | 6/10 | |
Movies & TV Score | |||
Movies & TV Score | 5.3/10 | 5.9/10 | |
Sports Score | |||
Sports Score | 6.7/10 | 6.6/10 | |
PHYSICAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | |||
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | 33" x 57.2" x 2.3" | 32.7" x 57.1" x 2.4" | |
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | |||
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | 35.4" x 57.2" | 35.7" x 57.1" | |
Weight without Stand | |||
Weight without Stand | 49.8 lbs | 32.7 lbs | |
VESA Mount | |||
VESA Mount | 300 x 300 | 400 x 300 | |
DISPLAY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Color Depth | |||
Color Depth | 10 bit | 10 bit | |
Black Frame Insertion | |||
Black Frame Insertion | No | Yes | |
Auto Low Latency Mode | |||
Auto Low Latency Mode | Yes | Yes | |
Contrast | |||
Contrast | 5/10 | 5.8/10 | |
Local Dimming | |||
Local Dimming | 2.5/10 | 4.1/10 | |
SOUND | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Speaker Setup | |||
Speaker Setup | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
Speaker Power | |||
Speaker Power | 20 W | 20 W | |
Dolby Atmos | |||
Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes | |
DTS:X | |||
DTS:X | No | No | |
Get a great deal on the LG NANO75 (LCD) or the Samsung CU7000 (LCD)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
About Samsung
Samsung, a South Korean electronics manufacturer, holds the title of being the largest global TV vendor in terms of units sold. They offer a diverse lineup of TV products that cater to various budget ranges. A notable achievement in recent years is the development of Quantum Dots, a technology that enhances color reproduction, resulting in richer and more vibrant hues. Samsung TVs are well-regarded for their high manufacturing quality and user-friendly software, making them an excellent choice for consumers seeking an intuitive viewing experience.
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
TV guides you might be interested in
More comparisons for you
Compare LG NANO75 (LCD) vs. Hisense U8K (LCD)
VS
Compare LG NANO75 (LCD) vs. Samsung Q70A (LCD)
VS
Compare LG NANO75 (LCD) vs. Samsung Q60B (LCD)
VS
Compare Samsung CU7000 (LCD) vs. Insignia F30 2024 (LCD)
VS
Compare Samsung CU7000 (LCD) vs. TCL S446 (LCD)
VS
Compare Samsung CU7000 (LCD) vs. TCL S450F (LCD)
VS
FAQs
FAQs about TVs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
122,430
Recommendations made
18,365
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.
Featured in
