A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec TV team Learn more
Updated January 10, 2024·
The LG NANO75 is generally less expensive than the Samsung Q60C. If budget is a key concern and you mainly watch various types of content, the LG NANO75 is a suitable choice. However, if you are looking for overall better image quality, particularly in darker environments, and can afford to spend a little more, the Samsung Q60C would be the better option. Its performance in a bright room is also slightly better than the LG NANO75. Those who prioritize watching sports and streaming content like news, talk shows, reality TV, and animation will find that the Samsung Q60C performs better in these areas compared to the LG NANO75. But for gamers, the difference in gaming performance between the two TVs is minimal. Both TVs have similar input lag, making them responsive for gaming, but the contrast is better on the Samsung Q60C, which means you'll get deeper blacks. Neither TV is particularly strong in sound quality, so consider a separate sound system for either choice. Additionally, both have similar accessibility features, but the Samsung Q60C offers voice command capabilities, which the LG NANO75 does not. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
- Good for upscaling
- Good reflections
Advantages of the Samsung Q60C (LCD)
- Good for cartoons & animation
- Very good motion processing
Key differences
Cartoons & Animation
5.9
7.5
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
7.3/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.3/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.9/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.8/10
6.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
7.0/10
The Samsung Q60C (LCD) is good for cartoons & animation, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The Samsung Q60C is better for watching cartoons and animation because it has a higher color gamut and color volume, which means it can display a wider range of colors more accurately. Conversely, the LG NANO75 has a fair color gamut and poor color volume, leading to less vibrant and less varied color reproduction, which is less ideal for animated content where color performance is very important.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.1
6.8
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.9/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
6.6/10
The Samsung Q60C (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both only fair for news, talk, & other TV, though the Samsung Q60C (LCD) is somewhat better.
The LG NANO75 delivers fair upscaling quality and has a somewhat limited SDR brightness, which means while it can make lower resolution content look decent, it's not the best for very bright rooms; its color performance out of the box and color gamut are suitable for standard TV watching but lack local dimming for deeper contrast. In contrast, the Samsung Q60C offers good SDR brightness, enhancing visibility in well-lit environments, and has better upscaling capabilities, alongside a more robust color gamut, making it suitable for vibrant news and talk shows, though its local dimming feature is also not ideal for achieving the best contrast.
Bright Room
5.8
6.5
6.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.3/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.9/10
5.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.7/10
7.8/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
6.3/10
The Samsung Q60C (LCD) is only fair for bright room, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 is less suitable for bright rooms due to its poor SDR and HDR brightness and although it handles reflections well, it may still appear dim under intense light. Conversely, the Samsung Q60C performs better in this setting with decent SDR brightness and fair reflection handling, yet it might still struggle with HDR content brightness in very bright environments.
Cost
$900
$750
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has a price of $900 and the Samsung Q60C (LCD) costs $750.
Let Us Help Find Your Perfect TV
Find your new TV
Key similarities
Picture Quality
5.6
6.0
4.97/10
CONTRAST
5.55/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.3/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
LED
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Samsung Q60C (LCD) to have only fair picture quality, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2
5.5
4.97/10
CONTRAST
5.55/10
5.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
2.9/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
6.6/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
Yes
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
No
The Samsung Q60C (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both poor for movies & TV.
The LG NANO75 is not ideal for movies and cinematic TV as it has a low contrast level and poor black uniformity, which can make dark scenes appear washed out, and it lacks local dimming to improve picture depth. Similarly, the Samsung Q60C also falls short in providing a cinematic experience due to its slightly better but still limited contrast, very poor black uniformity, and minimal local dimming capability that diminishes the overall quality of dark scenes.
Sports
6.7
6.5
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
6.6/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.9/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and Samsung Q60C (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The LG NANO75 has slightly worse motion processing than the Samsung Q60C, which can be important when watching fast-paced sports. However, the LG offers better viewing angles, which may provide a more consistent image across the screen when watching with a group, while the Samsung has fewer reflections and better gray uniformity, making it more suitable for bright rooms.
Gaming
5.7
5.7
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
5.2/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
30.0/100
5.7/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.1/10
The Samsung Q60C (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both poor for gaming.
The LG NANO75 has mediocre response time and exceptional input lag, which may lead to some blurring during fast-paced games but will respond quickly to your input. The Samsung Q60C, on the other hand, has poor response time and exceptional input lag, meaning you'll experience more blurring with moving objects, but it still responds swiftly to gaming inputs.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO75 (LCD) and the Samsung Q60C (LCD) compare to other TVs
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| LG NANO75 (LCD) | Samsung Q60C (LCD) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$900 | $750 | ||
Brand | |||
Brand | LG | Samsung | |
Release Date | |||
Release Date | March 4, 2022 | April 5, 2023 | |
Full name | |||
Full name | 65NANO75 | QN65Q60C | |
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 65" | 65" | |
Screen Resolution | |||
Screen Resolution | 4K | 4K | |
TV FEATURES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Operating System | |||
Operating System | webOS | Tizen | |
Sound Quality Score | |||
Sound Quality Score | 6.1/10 | 6.6/10 | |
NextGen Ready | |||
NextGen Ready | No | No | |
HDMI Ports | |||
HDMI Ports | 3 | 3 | |
Coax Ports | |||
Coax Ports | 1 | 1 | |
DISPLAY QUALITY SCORES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Picture Quality Score | |||
Picture Quality Score | 5.7/10 | 6.1/10 | |
Bright Room Score | |||
Bright Room Score | 5.8/10 | 6.5/10 | |
Gaming Score | |||
Gaming Score | 5.7/10 | 5.7/10 | |
Movies & TV Score | |||
Movies & TV Score | 5.3/10 | 5.5/10 | |
Sports Score | |||
Sports Score | 6.7/10 | 6.5/10 | |
PHYSICAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | |||
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | 33" x 57.2" x 2.3" | 32.7" x 57.1" x 1" | |
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | |||
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | 35.4" x 57.2" | 34.3" x 57.1" | |
Weight without Stand | |||
Weight without Stand | 49.8 lbs | Unknown | |
VESA Mount | |||
VESA Mount | 300 x 300 | 400 x 300 | |
DISPLAY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Color Depth | |||
Color Depth | 10 bit | 10 bit | |
Black Frame Insertion | |||
Black Frame Insertion | No | Yes | |
Auto Low Latency Mode | |||
Auto Low Latency Mode | Yes | Yes | |
Contrast | |||
Contrast | 5/10 | 5.6/10 | |
Local Dimming | |||
Local Dimming | 2.5/10 | 4.1/10 | |
SOUND | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Speaker Setup | |||
Speaker Setup | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
Speaker Power | |||
Speaker Power | 20 W | 20 W | |
Dolby Atmos | |||
Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes | |
DTS:X | |||
DTS:X | No | No | |
Get a great deal on the LG NANO75 (LCD) or the Samsung Q60C (LCD)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
About Samsung
Samsung, a South Korean electronics manufacturer, holds the title of being the largest global TV vendor in terms of units sold. They offer a diverse lineup of TV products that cater to various budget ranges. A notable achievement in recent years is the development of Quantum Dots, a technology that enhances color reproduction, resulting in richer and more vibrant hues. Samsung TVs are well-regarded for their high manufacturing quality and user-friendly software, making them an excellent choice for consumers seeking an intuitive viewing experience.
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
TV guides you might be interested in
More comparisons for you
Compare LG NANO75 (LCD) vs. Hisense U8K (LCD)
VS
Compare LG NANO75 (LCD) vs. Samsung Q70A (LCD)
VS
Compare LG NANO75 (LCD) vs. Samsung Q60B (LCD)
VS
Compare Samsung Q60C (LCD) vs. Vizio V-Series '22 (LCD)
VS
Compare Samsung Q60C (LCD) vs. Vizio M-Series (LCD)
VS
Compare Samsung Q60C (LCD) vs. Amazon Omni Series (LCD)
VS
FAQs
FAQs about TVs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
119,130
Recommendations made
17,870
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.
Featured in
