The LG NANO75 is a lower midrange priced TV and often significantly less expensive than the Samsung Q80B. It offers decent performance for sports content and casual gaming, and it is a reasonable choice if you're on a tighter budget. However, it may not perform as well in a dark room due to its lower contrast.
On the other hand, the Samsung Q80B is an upper midrange priced TV that's often significantly more expensive but offers better overall picture quality. It is superior for gaming with a higher refresh rate and has enhanced brightness, making it suitable for bright rooms. Its better viewing angle and reflection handling also make it a good fit for broader seating arrangements and well-lit environments. If premium gaming experience and picture quality are high priorities and you're willing to pay more, then the Samsung Q80B is a better choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
Good reflections
Advantages of the Samsung Q80B (LCD)
Good for bright room
Very good for gaming
Good for news, talk, & other TV
Good for cartoons & animation
Good for use as monitor
Very good motion processing
Good viewing angle
Key differences
Picture Quality
5.6/10
7.1/10
4.97/10
CONTRAST
5.33/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.5/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
LED FALD
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
IPS
The Samsung Q80B (LCD) has good picture quality, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2/10
6.4/10
4.97/10
CONTRAST
5.33/10
5.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
5.2/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
Yes
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
No
The Samsung Q80B (LCD) is only fair for movies & TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 has poorer contrast and lacks local dimming, which negatively affects its ability to produce deep blacks and diminishes its overall picture quality for movies and cinematic TV, particularly compared to the Samsung Q80B that offers slightly better contrast and local dimming capabilities, resulting in better black uniformity. While both TVs have decent viewing angles, the LG’s color volume is weak, making it less suited for displaying a wide range of colors in movies, contrasting with the Samsung, which has good color volume and more accurate colors straight out of the box, enhancing the movie-watching experience.
Gaming
5.7/10
8.2/10
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
8.1/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
60.0/100
5.7/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.0/10
The Samsung Q80B (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 has a lower response time and poor input lag, which can affect fast-paced gaming performance, whereas the Samsung Q80B has a very good response time and the best input lag, making it more suitable for a responsive gaming experience. Additionally, the Samsung Q80B offers a higher refresh rate that benefits smooth gameplay compared to the LG NANO75.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9/10
7.6/10
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
7.3/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.5/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.8/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.8/10
6.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
6.4/10
The Samsung Q80B (LCD) is good for cartoons & animation, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The Samsung Q80B is considered good for watching cartoons and animation because it boasts a strong color gamut and color volume, ensuring vibrant and full colors. Conversely, the LG NANO75 is viewed as poorer for such content due to its inadequate color volume which might lead to less dynamic colors, despite both TVs having a similar color gamut offering decent variety in colors.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.1/10
7.8/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.8/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
The Samsung Q80B (LCD) is good for news, talk, & other TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is only fair.
The Samsung Q80B stands out for watching TV programs like news and talk shows because it offers very good upscaling of lower resolution content and better SDR brightness, making it suitable for well-lit rooms, whereas the LG NANO75, while fair, has poorer SDR brightness, which can make it less ideal in brighter viewing environments, despite both TVs having the same score for upscaling. The Samsung also has a slight advantage in terms of colors out of the box and the overall color gamut, enhancing the immediate viewing experience without the need for additional calibration.
Bright Room
5.8/10
7.4/10
6.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
7.4/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.8/10
5.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.7/10
7.8/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
6.0/10
The Samsung Q80B (LCD) is good for bright room, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
Cost
$580
$798
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has a price of $580 and the Samsung Q80B (LCD) costs $798.
The Samsung Q80B (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The LG NANO75 has a fair response time and good reflection handling, which is beneficial for watching sports, but its viewing angles and grey uniformity are relatively limited, leading to less consistent image quality when viewed from an angle or when displaying uniform colors across the screen. The Samsung Q80B, on the other hand, has very good response time and better motion processing capabilities, which minimizes motion blur during fast-paced games, but its reflection handling is only fair, making it less ideal for very bright rooms.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO75 (LCD) and the Samsung Q80B (LCD) compare to other TVs
"For most people its picture, sound, and price make it a midrange TV worth considering. HDR brightness was generally exceptional. Its viewing angles are shockingly good, among the very best we’ve seen recently from any non-OLED TV. For gamers input lag isn’t too shabby."
Get a great deal on the LG NANO75 (LCD) or the Samsung Q80B (LCD)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
About Samsung
Samsung, a South Korean electronics manufacturer, holds the title of being the largest global TV vendor in terms of units sold. They offer a diverse lineup of TV products that cater to various budget ranges. A notable achievement in recent years is the development of Quantum Dots, a technology that enhances color reproduction, resulting in richer and more vibrant hues. Samsung TVs are well-regarded for their high manufacturing quality and user-friendly software, making them an excellent choice for consumers seeking an intuitive viewing experience.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
129,630
Recommendations made
19,445
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.