A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec TV team Learn more
Updated January 10, 2024·
The Samsung QN90A generally offers a superior viewing experience compared to the LG NANO75, especially in bright rooms, and for watching movies and high dynamic range (HDR) content. Its picture quality, reflection handling, brightness, and contrast are better, making it a good fit for most types of viewing content, including sports and gaming. On the other hand, if you're on a tighter budget, the LG NANO75 comes at a lower price and still provides decent overall picture quality. It has a wider viewing angle, which might make it a better choice if you often watch TV with a large group spread out across the room. It's important to note that the Samsung model has more HDMI ports and offers better sound quality, features that could enhance your viewing and gaming experiences. However, if these features aren't crucial to you or if the higher cost is a concern, the LG might be the more economical choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
- The LG NANO75 (LCD) has no clear advantages over the Samsung QN90A (LCD).
Advantages of the Samsung QN90A (LCD)
- Best in class for bright room
- Good for dark room
- Very good for gaming
- Very good for movies & TV
- Good for sports
- Very good for news, talk, & other TV
- Very good for cartoons & animation
- Very good for use as monitor
- Very good for upscaling
- Very good motion processing
- Excellent reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
5.6
8.1
4.97/10
CONTRAST
7.00/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
8.2/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
miniLED FALD
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
The Samsung QN90A (LCD) has very good picture quality, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2
8.0
4.97/10
CONTRAST
7.00/10
5.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
7.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
Yes
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
No
The Samsung QN90A (LCD) is very good for movies & TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 struggles with lower contrast and poor black uniformity which can make dark scenes in movies look grayish, while the Samsung QN90A's higher contrast and effective local dimming enable deep blacks and better dark scene reproduction, making it more suitable for cinematic content. Additionally, the Samsung has better color volume and gray uniformity, contributing to a richer and more consistent image, whereas the LG may have more washed-out colors and less even screen lighting.
Gaming
5.7
8.3
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
8.3/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
70.0/100
5.7/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.3/10
The Samsung QN90A (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 has a fair response time and the highest input lag rating, which may make it less suited for fast-paced gaming where quick screen transitions are crucial. Conversely, the Samsung QN90A is rated very good for response time and also the highest for input lag, providing a more responsive and fluid gaming experience, particularly beneficial for competitive or reaction-based games.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9
8.8
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
7.8/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
8.2/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.4/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
9.5/10
6.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
6.4/10
The Samsung QN90A (LCD) is very good for cartoons & animation, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The Samsung QN90A is very good for watching cartoons and animation because it offers vibrant and accurate colors straight out of the box and an ample color gamut, which ensures a wide range of colors are displayed. In contrast, the LG NANO75 is considered poor for the same content due to less impressive performance in these critical areas, leading to less striking colors for animated visuals.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.1
8.9
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.4/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
The Samsung QN90A (LCD) is very good for news, talk, & other TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is only fair.
The Samsung QN90A is superior for watching news and talk shows due to its excellent SDR brightness and highly rated upscaling, ensuring clear images in different lighting conditions and when watching lower resolution content. In comparison, the LG NANO75 is deemed fair because it has lower SDR brightness and upscaling quality, which can affect clarity and detail during daytime viewing or when watching standard definition content.
Bright Room
5.8
9.7
6.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
6.5/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.4/10
5.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.3/10
7.8/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
9.0/10
The Samsung QN90A (LCD) is best in class for bright room, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 struggles in bright rooms due to its poor SDR and HDR brightness and weaker handling of reflections, making it harder to see in sunny conditions, while the Samsung QN90A excels in bright environments because of its excellent SDR and HDR brightness and superior reflection handling, providing a clear picture even in well-lit rooms.
Cost
$480
$948
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has a price of $480 and the Samsung QN90A (LCD) costs $948.
Let Us Help Find Your Perfect TV
Find your new TV
Key similarities
Sports
6.7
7.0
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.4/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Samsung QN90A (LCD) to be good for sports, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is only fair.
The Samsung QN90A is rated higher for sports viewing compared to the LG NANO75 primarily due to its superior motion processing, which reduces blurring during fast action and its better reflection handling, making it more suitable for bright rooms. Additionally, it has wider viewing angles allowing for better viewing from different points in the room and a faster response time minimizing motion blur. The LG NANO75, though fair for sports, lags behind in these key aspects which are crucial for enjoying fast-paced sports content.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO75 (LCD) and the Samsung QN90A (LCD) compare to other TVs
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| LG NANO75 (LCD) | Samsung QN90A (LCD) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$480 | $948 | ||
Brand | |||
Brand | LG | Samsung | |
Release Date | |||
Release Date | March 1, 2022 | February 1, 2021 | |
Full name | |||
Full name | 43NANO75 | QN43QN90A | |
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 43" | 43" | |
Screen Resolution | |||
Screen Resolution | 4K | 4K | |
TV FEATURES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Operating System | |||
Operating System | webOS | Tizen | |
Sound Quality Score | |||
Sound Quality Score | 6.1/10 | 8.3/10 | |
NextGen Ready | |||
NextGen Ready | No | Yes | |
HDMI Ports | |||
HDMI Ports | 3 | 4 | |
Coax Ports | |||
Coax Ports | 1 | 1 | |
DISPLAY QUALITY SCORES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Picture Quality Score | |||
Picture Quality Score | 5.7/10 | 8.2/10 | |
Bright Room Score | |||
Bright Room Score | 5.8/10 | 9.8/10 | |
Gaming Score | |||
Gaming Score | 5.7/10 | 8.4/10 | |
Movies & TV Score | |||
Movies & TV Score | 5.3/10 | 8.1/10 | |
Sports Score | |||
Sports Score | 6.7/10 | 7/10 | |
PHYSICAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | |||
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | 22.2" x 38.1" x 2.3" | 22" x 37.8" x 1.1" | |
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | |||
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | 24.5" x 38.1" | 24.5" x 37.8" | |
Weight without Stand | |||
Weight without Stand | 20.3 lbs | 20.3 lbs | |
VESA Mount | |||
VESA Mount | 200 x 200 | 200 x 200 | |
DISPLAY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Color Depth | |||
Color Depth | 10 bit | 10 bit | |
Black Frame Insertion | |||
Black Frame Insertion | No | Yes | |
Auto Low Latency Mode | |||
Auto Low Latency Mode | Yes | Yes | |
Contrast | |||
Contrast | 5/10 | 7/10 | |
Local Dimming | |||
Local Dimming | 2.5/10 | 8/10 | |
SOUND | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Speaker Setup | |||
Speaker Setup | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
Speaker Power | |||
Speaker Power | 20 W | 20 W | |
Dolby Atmos | |||
Dolby Atmos | Yes | Bypass only | |
DTS:X | |||
DTS:X | No | No | |
Get a great deal on the LG NANO75 (LCD) or the Samsung QN90A (LCD)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
About Samsung
Samsung, a South Korean electronics manufacturer, holds the title of being the largest global TV vendor in terms of units sold. They offer a diverse lineup of TV products that cater to various budget ranges. A notable achievement in recent years is the development of Quantum Dots, a technology that enhances color reproduction, resulting in richer and more vibrant hues. Samsung TVs are well-regarded for their high manufacturing quality and user-friendly software, making them an excellent choice for consumers seeking an intuitive viewing experience.
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
TV guides you might be interested in
More comparisons for you
Compare LG NANO75 (LCD) vs. LG UP8000 (LCD)
VS
Compare LG NANO75 (LCD) vs. Samsung Q60B (LCD)
VS
Compare LG NANO75 (LCD) vs. Sony X80K (LCD)
VS
Compare Samsung QN90A (LCD) vs. Samsung QN90B (LCD)
VS
Compare Samsung QN90A (LCD) vs. Samsung Frame Series (LCD)
VS
Compare Samsung QN90A (LCD) vs. Sony X85J (LCD)
VS
FAQs
FAQs about TVs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
129,330
Recommendations made
19,400
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.
Featured in
