If you're looking for a more budget-friendly option, the Hisense A6H could be suitable. It's decent for casual gaming and watching cartoons or animation. However, it doesn't perform as well in bright rooms or for movies in dark rooms.
The LG NANO90, on the other hand, demands a higher price but provides better overall picture quality, making it a good fit for diverse content including sports, movies, and gaming. It has a better performance in both bright and darker environments. As a plus, the LG NANO90 supports a smoother gaming experience due to its higher refresh rate.
Choose the Hisense A6H if you're on a tight budget. Opt for the LG NANO90 if your priority is a more versatile TV that performs well across different lighting conditions and with varied content. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Hisense A6H (LCD)
Good viewing angle
Advantages of the LG NANO90 (LCD)
Very good for gaming
Good for use as monitor
Good motion processing
Very good reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
5.2/10
6.1/10
3.35/10
CONTRAST
5.28/10
6.1/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
6.6/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
LED FALD
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
IPS
The LG NANO90 (LCD) has only fair picture quality, while the Hisense A6H (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
4.9/10
5.6/10
3.35/10
CONTRAST
5.28/10
5.4/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
5.3/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
Yes
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
Yes
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The LG NANO90 (LCD) and Hisense A6H (LCD) are both poor for movies & TV, though the LG NANO90 (LCD) is somewhat better.
The Hisense A6H struggles with black uniformity and lacks local dimming which compromises its ability to deliver true blacks, making it less ideal for movies. The LG NANO90, while providing better contrast and local dimming than the Hisense A6H, also suffers from poor black uniformity affecting its performance during dark scenes in movies and cinematic content.
Sports
6.1/10
6.8/10
2.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
7.5/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.7/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
5.5/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.8/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG NANO90 (LCD) and Hisense A6H (LCD) are both only fair for sports, though the LG NANO90 (LCD) is somewhat better.
The Hisense A6H struggles with motion processing which is noticeable when watching fast-paced sports, whereas the LG NANO90 with better motion processing and response time provides a smoother viewing experience; however, the Hisense A6H has wider viewing angles making it more suitable for group watching but both TVs face challenges with reflection handling that can be bothersome in well-lit rooms.
Gaming
5.7/10
8.0/10
5.9/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
7.6/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.7/10
2.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
7.5/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
50.0/100
5.4/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.6/10
The LG NANO90 (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the Hisense A6H (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO90 has a good response time, which results in less motion blur during gaming, and very good input lag performance that ensures quicker reaction to inputs compared to the Hisense A6H, which has poor response time leading to more blur and, while it has the best input lag, its slower response may impact gaming enjoyment.
News, Talk, & Other TV
5.8/10
6.4/10
5.5/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.8/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
The LG NANO90 (LCD) is only fair for news, talk, & other TV, while the Hisense A6H (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense A6H may struggle in displaying news and TV programs in a bright room due to its poor SDR brightness and lacks a wider color gamut, leading to less vibrant colors. In contrast, the LG NANO90 offers better performance for these types of content with good SDR brightness, ensuring visibility even in well-lit environments, and a fair color gamut for more accurate colors.
Bright Room
5.4/10
6.9/10
7.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
6.3/10
5.5/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.8/10
5.3/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.2/10
6.0/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
8.0/10
The LG NANO90 (LCD) is only fair for bright room, while the Hisense A6H (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense A6H struggles with brightness and reflection handling, making it less suitable for bright rooms, while the LG NANO90 provides better brightness and superior reflection handling, offering a more comfortable viewing experience in well-lit environments. Although both TVs have similar contrast and color capabilities, the LG's performance in key areas important for bright room viewing sets it apart from the Hisense A6H.
Cost
$650
$1,719
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The Hisense A6H (LCD) has a price of $650 and the LG NANO90 (LCD) costs $1,719.
The Hisense A6H (LCD) and LG NANO90 (LCD) are both poor for cartoons & animation.
The Hisense A6H exhibits colors out of the box that are considered very good, which can be great for cartoons and animation, but its poor color gamut impedes the display of a wide range of colors which is crucial for vibrant animated content. Conversely, the LG NANO90 is evaluated as poor for colors out of the box, which means it may not provide the accuracy needed for such content right away, although other aspects like color volume and contrast are only rated as fair, further affecting its suitability for animation viewing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Hisense A6H (LCD) and the LG NANO90 (LCD) compare to other TVs
"Here we have HDR pictures that look bright, but also manage to typically hit decently deep black levels.WebOS continues, though, to be one of the easiest to use. Connections are strong for a mid-range TV. Native 4K pictures look crisp and detailed."
Get a great deal on the Hisense A6H (LCD) or the LG NANO90 (LCD)
About Hisense
Hisense, a Chinese TV manufacturer, entered the US market in approximately 2011 and has since acquired TV divisions from various companies such as Toshiba, Sharp, Hitachi, and NEC. Currently ranking as the fourth largest vendor in terms of sales volume, Hisense aims to capture a wide range of TV budget segments. They offer exceptional value with TVs that often outperform their competitors at similar price points, making them a compelling choice for consumers. In the US, they use Google TV as their smart TV software which provides the largest app selection and a very modern user interface, however it is not as user friendly as the software from other vendors.
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
122,730
Recommendations made
18,410
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.