The Hisense A65K is a budget-friendly option and will cost significantly less than the TCL QM8, making it suitable for those who want to save money. However, it has a lower overall picture quality, less effective handling of reflections, and is not as bright, which means it might not perform as well in bright rooms or for HDR content. It also has lower scores for gaming, sports, and dark room performance.
The TCL QM8 is a midrange-priced TV that costs more but offers superior picture quality, better performance in bright rooms, higher brightness for HDR content, and top-notch gaming features. This makes it a better choice for serious gamers and those who watch lots of movies and demand a high-quality picture. Its reflection handling is also much better, which is beneficial if you have a bright living space.
In summary, if budget is your main concern, the Hisense A65K could serve you well, especially for general viewing. If you're willing to invest more for a better overall experience, particularly for gaming and bright room conditions, the TCL QM8 is the more suitable choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Hisense A65K (LCD)
Good for upscaling
Advantages of the TCL QM8 (LCD)
Best in class for bright room
Very good for dark room
Very good for gaming
Very good for movies & TV
Very good for cartoons & animation
Good for use as monitor
Very good reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
6.7/10
8.5/10
5.64/10
CONTRAST
8.00/10
7.2/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
9.2/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
miniLED FALD
VA
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
The TCL QM8 (LCD) has very good picture quality, while the Hisense A65K (LCD) has only fair picture quality.
The TCL QM8 has superior picture quality because it offers excellent contrast, very effective local dimming, high HDR brightness, and great black uniformity, which contributes to more vivid and true-to-life images, especially in dark scenes. In contrast, the Hisense A65K struggles with poor contrast, ineffective local dimming, fair HDR brightness, and just fair black uniformity, resulting in a less impressive image reproduction, particularly in terms of depth and detail in darker content.
Movies & TV
5.9/10
8.3/10
5.64/10
CONTRAST
8.00/10
6.3/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
8.5/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
4.8/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
Yes
Yes
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The TCL QM8 (LCD) is very good for movies & TV, while the Hisense A65K (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense A65K struggles with movies and cinematic TV due to its lower contrast, less effective local dimming, and poorer black uniformity, which are crucial for deep blacks and detailed dark scenes. In contrast, the TCL QM8 excels in these areas, providing better contrast, robust local dimming, and excellent black uniformity, thus offering a more immersive viewing experience with more vibrant and uniform colors.
Gaming
5.9/10
8.3/10
6.8/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
8.1/10
8.7/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
7.6/10
3.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
4.6/10
18.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
90.0/100
6.0/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.3/10
The TCL QM8 (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the Hisense A65K (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense A65K has a lower response time and input lag performance compared to the TCL QM8, which translates to slower screen changes and delayed reactions in fast-paced games. Additionally, the TCL QM8 has a higher refresh rate, further enhancing its gaming capabilities by producing smoother motion and less blur during gameplay.
Cartoons & Animation
7.3/10
8.9/10
7.6/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
8.1/10
7.2/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
9.2/10
7.2/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
10.0/10
8.1/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.6/10
5.7/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
7.5/10
The TCL QM8 (LCD) is very good for cartoons & animation, while the Hisense A65K (LCD) is good.
The TCL QM8 excels in displaying cartoons and animation due to its 'Very Good' color gamut and 'Excellent' color volume, which enable a wide array and depth of colors, making the images pop. In comparison, the Hisense A65K, while offering 'Very Good' colors out of the box, has only 'Good' ratings for color gamut and color volume, which may limit the vibrancy and richness of colors despite providing a pleasing initial setup.
Bright Room
6.4/10
9.9/10
5.3/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.3/10
7.2/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
10.0/10
6.2/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
9.3/10
6.6/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
8.9/10
The TCL QM8 (LCD) is best in class for bright room, while the Hisense A65K (LCD) is only fair.
The TCL QM8 outshines the Hisense A65K in bright rooms largely due to its superior HDR brightness and better handling of reflections, which keeps the picture clear and vibrant even when ambient light is strong. While the Hisense A65K offers fair performance with decent SDR brightness and reflection handling, it doesn't reach the levels of brightness or anti-reflective capabilities that the TCL QM8 offers, which contributes to the latter's 'best' categorization for bright-room viewing.
Cost
$370
$1,498
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The Hisense A65K (LCD) has a price of $370 and the TCL QM8 (LCD) costs $1,498.
The TCL QM8 (LCD) and Hisense A65K (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The Hisense A65K and TCL QM8 both exhibit fair performance when watching sports; this is partly because they have similar response times, which are important for clear motion. However, the TCL QM8 has a higher score in handling reflections, which could make it a better choice for bright rooms, but both have a limited viewing angle, reducing off-center viewing clarity.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.7/10
6.8/10
7.2/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
10.0/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
4.8/10
The TCL QM8 (LCD) and Hisense A65K (LCD) are both only fair for news, talk, & other TV.
The Hisense A65K and the TCL QM8 are considered fair for watching news, talk shows, and other TV programs primarily because of their upscaling capabilities. The Hisense A65K offers good SDR brightness which is beneficial for such content, while the TCL QM8, despite its superior contrast and very good color out of the box, might not provide a significantly different experience for these types of programs, where high contrast and a wide color gamut are less critical.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Hisense A65K (LCD) and the TCL QM8 (LCD) compare to other TVs
"The A65K proved to be a rather capable TV that works great within its extreme limitations that its price dictates. It has great contrast, very low input lag and good color coverage. Add Google TV and a low price in the mix and you have an excellent low budget offering."
Get a great deal on the Hisense A65K (LCD) or the TCL QM8 (LCD)
About Hisense
Hisense, a Chinese TV manufacturer, entered the US market in approximately 2011 and has since acquired TV divisions from various companies such as Toshiba, Sharp, Hitachi, and NEC. Currently ranking as the fourth largest vendor in terms of sales volume, Hisense aims to capture a wide range of TV budget segments. They offer exceptional value with TVs that often outperform their competitors at similar price points, making them a compelling choice for consumers. In the US, they use Google TV as their smart TV software which provides the largest app selection and a very modern user interface, however it is not as user friendly as the software from other vendors.
About TCL
TCL, the highly recognizable TV brand from China, has firmly established itself as the second-largest manufacturer in terms of sales volume. Renowned for striking an impressive balance between affordability, picture quality, and design, TCL TVs deliver a compelling overall package. While they have traditionally excelled in the low-end and midrange TV segments, TCL has recently made remarkable strides in the realm of high-end televisions, introducing impressive models that rival top competitors. Most TCL TVs use Roku software which is very user friendly and easy to use, but they have a few other models that use Google TV which has the largest app selection, but is not as user friendly as Roku.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
121,530
Recommendations made
18,230
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.