The Hisense A65K is often significantly less expensive than the Samsung CU8000 and performs better for watching movies and series, as well as for viewing cartoons and animation. It also has greater contrast and is a bit better for dark room viewing. On the other hand, the Samsung CU8000 is notably better for sports content and has slightly higher sound quality. Both TVs have similar input lag, which is good for gaming, but neither is exceptional in this area. If you often watch TV in a bright room, though, neither of these TVs is ideal, but the Hisense has a marginal edge. The Hisense has one more HDMI port compared to the Samsung, which can be helpful if you have multiple devices to connect. If you're looking for a more budget-friendly option with decent performance for movies and dark-room viewing, the Hisense could be a good choice. However, if you prefer slightly better sports performance and don't mind spending more, consider the Samsung. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Hisense A65K (LCD)
Good for cartoons & animation
Good for upscaling
Advantages of the Samsung CU8000 (LCD)
Very good motion processing
Key differences
Picture Quality
6.7/10
5.8/10
5.64/10
CONTRAST
4.92/10
7.2/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
6.9/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
LED
VA
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
The Hisense A65K (LCD) has only fair picture quality, while the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.9/10
5.3/10
5.64/10
CONTRAST
4.92/10
6.3/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
6.1/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
6.0/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
Yes
Yes
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
No
The Hisense A65K (LCD) and Samsung CU8000 (LCD) are both poor for movies & TV, though the Hisense A65K (LCD) is somewhat better.
The Hisense A65K's local dimming is poor, reducing its ability to display deep blacks which is crucial for watching movies and cinematic TV, and while it offers good colors out of the box, its overall contrast and black uniformity are only fair, lessening the picture quality in dark scenes. The Samsung CU8000 lacks any local dimming, resulting in lower contrast and poor black levels, which can make movie scenes look washed out, and it also has fair color volume and gray uniformity which can affect how vibrant and uniform the picture appears.
Cartoons & Animation
7.3/10
5.9/10
7.6/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
7.3/10
7.2/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
6.9/10
7.2/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.7/10
8.1/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
6.2/10
5.7/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
6.6/10
The Hisense A65K (LCD) is good for cartoons & animation, while the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense A65K is rated very good for colors out of the box and has a good color volume, which means it displays cartoons and animation with vibrant and consistent colors, while the Samsung CU8000 is rated fair in both aspects, leading to less impressive color performance with such content. Additionally, the better color gamut on the Hisense enhances the variety of colors displayed, making it more suitable for animated content that often uses a wide range of colors.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.7/10
5.7/10
7.2/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.7/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
6.0/10
The Hisense A65K (LCD) is only fair for news, talk, & other TV, while the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense A65K has very good upscaling and good SDR (Standard Dynamic Range) brightness, making it suitable for watching news and talk shows as it can effectively improve lower-resolution content and display it brightly enough for comfortable viewing. In contrast, the Samsung CU8000 has fair upscaling and fair SDR brightness, which means it might not handle lower resolution content from news programs as well and may not be as bright, affecting its performance for such content.
Bright Room
6.4/10
5.9/10
5.3/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.2/10
7.2/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.7/10
6.2/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.5/10
6.6/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
5.9/10
The Hisense A65K (LCD) is only fair for bright room, while the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) is poor.
Cost
$370
$578
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
The Hisense A65K (LCD) has a price of $370 and the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) costs $578.
The Samsung CU8000 (LCD) and Hisense A65K (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The Hisense A65K has fair motion processing for watching sports due to its adequate response time and fair handling of reflections, but viewing angles and gray uniformity could be limiting. The Samsung CU8000 struggles more with fast-moving content since its motion processing and response time are poorer than the Hisense, and its poor reflection handling and narrow viewing angles also detract from the sports viewing experience.
Gaming
5.9/10
5.5/10
6.8/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
4.9/10
8.7/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.7/10
3.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.2/10
18.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
0.0/100
6.0/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.8/10
The Hisense A65K (LCD) and Samsung CU8000 (LCD) are both poor for gaming.
The Hisense A65K has only a fair response time and input lag, which makes it less desirable for gaming where quick reflexes and timely reactions are crucial. Similarly, the Samsung CU8000's poor response time can lead to blur during fast-moving games, and although its input lag is very good, this may not sufficiently compensate for the slower screen updates for competitive gaming.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Hisense A65K (LCD) and the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) compare to other TVs
"The A65K proved to be a rather capable TV that works great within its extreme limitations that its price dictates. It has great contrast, very low input lag and good color coverage. Add Google TV and a low price in the mix and you have an excellent low budget offering."
Get a great deal on the Hisense A65K (LCD) or the Samsung CU8000 (LCD)
About Hisense
Hisense, a Chinese TV manufacturer, entered the US market in approximately 2011 and has since acquired TV divisions from various companies such as Toshiba, Sharp, Hitachi, and NEC. Currently ranking as the fourth largest vendor in terms of sales volume, Hisense aims to capture a wide range of TV budget segments. They offer exceptional value with TVs that often outperform their competitors at similar price points, making them a compelling choice for consumers. In the US, they use Google TV as their smart TV software which provides the largest app selection and a very modern user interface, however it is not as user friendly as the software from other vendors.
About Samsung
Samsung, a South Korean electronics manufacturer, holds the title of being the largest global TV vendor in terms of units sold. They offer a diverse lineup of TV products that cater to various budget ranges. A notable achievement in recent years is the development of Quantum Dots, a technology that enhances color reproduction, resulting in richer and more vibrant hues. Samsung TVs are well-regarded for their high manufacturing quality and user-friendly software, making them an excellent choice for consumers seeking an intuitive viewing experience.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
121,530
Recommendations made
18,230
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.