If you prefer better battery life and a larger screen, the Motorola Moto G100 would be suitable, although its camera performance is acceptable but not as impressive as the Samsung Galaxy A53. The Galaxy A53 boasts a higher-quality OLED display with a faster refresh rate, offering smoother visuals, which might make it a better choice if you prioritize display quality and camera performance, including better video capabilities. Both run Android and have similar storage, but the Galaxy A53 is the more recent model, which could mean better long-term support. Keep in mind, the Motorola may be less expensive but may not match the Samsung in some aspects like display and camera quality. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Motorola Moto G100
Good performance
Advantages of the Samsung Galaxy A53
Very good battery life
Key differences
Overall Camera Quality
4.9/10
5.9/10
The Samsung Galaxy A53 and Motorola Moto G100 both have poor overall camera quality, though the Samsung Galaxy A53 has somewhat better overall camera quality.
The Motorola Moto G100 has poor selfie quality, poor photos software experience, and poor performance in other photos categories such as dynamic range and low light, which diminishes the overall camera experience. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy A53 offers better selfie quality and a fair photos software experience, enhancing its camera's versatility and performance in various conditions.
Photo Quality
4.9/10
6.2/10
The Samsung Galaxy A53 takes only fair photos, while the Motorola Moto G100 takes poor photos.
The Motorola Moto G100 produces poor selfies due to a lower selfie quality evaluation, whereas the Samsung Galaxy A53 is better at taking selfies. Additionally, the Moto G100's photo software isn't rated as highly as the Galaxy A53's, resulting in less impressive overall photo quality.
Video Quality
4.7/10
5.2/10
The Samsung Galaxy A53 and Motorola Moto G100 both have poor videos, though the Samsung Galaxy A53 takes somewhat better videos.
The Motorola Moto G100 video quality suffers due to poor video stabilization and low light performance, while its software offers a fair experience. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy A53 delivers good video results, thanks to superior video stabilization and software that enhances the overall video recording experience.
Battery
7.1 Hours
8.0 Hours
The Motorola Moto G100 has 7.1 hours of battery life. The Samsung Galaxy A53 has 8 hours of battery life.
Cost
$300
$200
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
The Motorola Moto G100 has a price of $300 and the Samsung Galaxy A53 costs $200.
"A budget gaming-capable phone that foregoes the AMOLED screen hype and camera cost implications to deliver a half-price near-flagship that, in use, adds up to oh so much more. Even plugging away at games for hours at a time doesn't cause too much trouble where battery is concerned. The 5,000mAh cell is a big part of the reason for the G100's above average weight, but it's a great capacity to have at your fingertips."
"Samsung’s quartet of rear cameras delivers the goods, both day and night, with the only blemish being the lack of 4K/60fps video recording. The large, 6.5-inch, 120Hz AMOLED display is crisp and smooth, making video streaming enjoyable. You should have no issues pushing the 5,000mAh battery to its limits and it’s not too slow to charge relative to its competitors in the US."
Get a great deal on the Motorola Moto G100 or the Samsung Galaxy A53
About Motorola
Motorola, a well-known name in the smartphone world, has a long-standing legacy in the industry, with a history dating back to the early days of mobile phones. The brand is mostly known for striking a balance between affordability and functionality, as well as providing a clean and straightforward interface with their software skin on top of Android. While they have traditionally been prominent in the budget and midrange categories, Motorola has also occasionally ventured into the high-end category for smartphones.
About Samsung
Samsung is one of the most recognizable names in the smartphone industry, standing as the undisputed best-selling brand of Android smartphones in the United States for many years now. Samsung is known for offering a variety of smartphones in all available price points, as well as for implementing cutting-edge technology and innovative features in their flagship devices, ones that often shape the market going forward. The company offers its own unique spin on Android, called One UI, which focuses on offering a multitude of features and is heavily customizable, according to user preference.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec phones team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest phone information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
68
Phones evaluated
7,820
Phones stats compiled
8
Proprietary Phones ratings developed
152,400
Recommendations made
86,360
Consumer hours saved
About the phone team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Phones Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Seth Peoples
Phones Expert
Seth is a US-based product expert focusing on smartphones and he is a moderator of one of the largest smartphone subreddits. His tailored recommendations have helped him earn over 87k comment karma, putting him in the top 1% of Redditors.
Efthimis Kotanidis
Phones Expert
Efthimis is a Greece-based product expert focusing on smartphones. He has been recommending phones for 4 years and his recommendations on Reddit have earned him over 35k karma.