If you're a competitive gamer seeking high refresh rates and fast response times for a smoother gaming experience, the ViewSonic XG2431 is an affordable option. Its smaller screen and lower resolution might not be ideal for productivity or immersive media consumption. On the other hand, the ViewSonic XG321UG, with its larger screen and higher resolution, is better for productivity and watching videos, offering sharper image quality and better color accuracy, which is preferable for digital photo editing. However, it is at a higher price point and its refresh rate and response time may not satisfy competitive gaming requirements as well as the XG2431. Choose the XG321UG if you prioritize visual fidelity and a larger display for work and entertainment, and the XG2431 if your main focus is on fast-paced gaming performance without spending as much. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS)
Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED)
Good for productivity
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Good brightness
Very good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
6.4/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
900:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
343 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
507 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
78.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is only fair for casual gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
6.9/10
4.6/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
7.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
3.6 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48,144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
343 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is poor.
Productivity
5.0/10
7.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
137 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is good for productivity, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.4/10
6.7/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
900:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
343 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
507 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is only fair for media consumption, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$245
$2,300
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) has a price of $245 and the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) costs $2,300.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) and the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) compare to other monitors
"The ViewSonic XG2431 is an excellent gaming monitor, especially when used for HDR content. With top-notch video processing and a responsive 240 Hz on tap, it fulfills the needs of competitive players at an attractive price."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.