If price is a major consideration and your focus is on competitive gaming, the ViewSonic XG2431 with its rapid response time and high refresh rate will serve you well while keeping costs down. On the other hand, for the best visual quality, especially for HDR gaming and media consumption, the premium-priced ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED offers superior contrast and color depth. However, for tasks like productivity or casual gaming, both monitors will suffice, though the XG2431 may not deliver as rich a visual experience as the OLED, and the XG272's higher resolution may be less necessary for these uses. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS)
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED).
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Best in class for competitive gaming
Very good for media consumption
Good image clarity
Best in class contrast
Good brightness
Best in class response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
9.8/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
900:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
343 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
450 nits
507 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
78.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
6.9/10
9.6/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
7.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
40 - 240 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
343 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
450 nits
The ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is only fair.
Productivity
5.0/10
5.8/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
5.4/10
8.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
900:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
343 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
450 nits
507 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$245
$900
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) has a price of $245 and the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) costs $900.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) and ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) and ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) and the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
"The ViewSonic XG2431 is an excellent gaming monitor, especially when used for HDR content. With top-notch video processing and a responsive 240 Hz on tap, it fulfills the needs of competitive players at an attractive price."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,300
Recommendations made
17,445
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.