If you prioritize image quality for vivid colors and deep blacks in HDR gaming and media consumption, the ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED with its higher resolution and superior contrast is a solid choice despite the higher cost. However, if competitive gaming is your main focus, and you're looking for performance features like lower response time and refresh rate features with good value, the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) offers these at a midrange price. The XG2431 may not match the color depth and contrast of the VX2776 but excels in minimizing ghosting and providing a fluid gaming experience. Both models have their strengths, but your decision should align with whether you lean more towards superior visual experience or gaming performance. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Best in class for competitive gaming
Very good for media consumption
Good image clarity
Best in class contrast
Good brightness
Best in class response time
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS)
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED (W-OLED).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.8/10
5.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
450 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
78.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
9.6/10
6.9/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.5 ms
40 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
450 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
The ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is only fair.
Productivity
5.8/10
5.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED (W-OLED) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
8.0/10
5.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
450 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$1,000
$245
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) costs $245.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the ViewSonic VX2776 2K OLED (W-OLED) and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The ViewSonic XG2431 is an excellent gaming monitor, especially when used for HDR content. With top-notch video processing and a responsive 240 Hz on tap, it fulfills the needs of competitive players at an attractive price."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.