A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·
If you're an avid gamer looking for a large, immersive screen with superior contrast and a unique aspect ratio, the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 could be the right choice, but it comes at a premium cost and may not be as suitable for tasks requiring accurate color handling, like photo editing. On the other hand, the ViewSonic XG2431 is a more budget-friendly choice with great color accuracy, making it better for graphic design and photography, but its smaller size and lower resolution might not be as compelling for an immersive gaming or media experience. The Samsung also has a wider variable refresh rate range, which can make it a smoother option for gaming despite potential ghosting issues. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED)
- Good for casual gaming
- Good for media consumption
- Good text clarity
- Good image clarity
- Good contrast
- Good brightness
- Very good response time
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS)
- The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.7
5.8
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
3000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
420 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
2000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
78.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is good for casual gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
5.4
6.9
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
2.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.5 ms
60,240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
420 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is poor.
Productivity
6.7
5.0
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is only fair for productivity, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.1
5.4
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
3000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
420 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
2000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is good for media consumption, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$1,024
$245
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) has a price of $1,024 and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) costs $245.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is suitable for print photo editing while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) | ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$1,024 | $245 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 49" | 24" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 5120 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | Mini LED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | VA | IPS | |
Local Dimming Zones | |||
Local Dimming Zones | 2048 | N/A | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 3000:1 | 900:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 420 nits | 343 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 2000 nits | 507 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 85.5 % | 99.5 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 2 ms | 7.5 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 60,240 Hz | 20 - 240 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | Yes | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 8/10 | 8/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 9/10 | 7.8/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 109 PPI | 93 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 7/10 | 6.3/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7/10 | 6.3/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 0 | 1 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 2 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Shopping
ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
Tom's Hardware
Christian Eberle | January 2022
"The ViewSonic XG2431 is an excellent gaming monitor, especially when used for HDR content. With top-notch video processing and a responsive 240 Hz on tap, it fulfills the needs of competitive players at an attractive price."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) vs. Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) vs. LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)
VS
Compare Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) vs. Asus PA329C (IPS)
VS
Compare ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) vs. MSI G273QPF (IPS)
VS
Compare ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) vs. Dell S2722DGM (VA)
VS
Compare ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) vs. Dell S3222DGM (VA)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,600
Recommendations made
16,140
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
