A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·
If competitive gaming is a priority and you don't mind spending more, the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 offers an ultra-wide screen with a high refresh rate, enhancing immersive gameplay. However, it's not the best for HDR gaming and media. On the other hand, the Sony M9, being more affordable, excels in productivity tasks due to its superior image clarity and color accuracy. It also offers good HDR performance for gaming and media. If budget and a balanced performance for work and entertainment are your considerations, Sony M9 would be a better choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED)
- Very good refresh rate
- Very good response time
Advantages of the Sony M9 (IPS FALD)
- Best in class for productivity
- Very good text clarity
- Very good image clarity
- Good color volume
Key differences
Productivity
6.7
9.6
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Sony M9 (IPS FALD) is best in class for productivity, while the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is only fair.
Cost
$1,024
$800
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) has a price of $1,024 and the Sony M9 (IPS FALD) costs $800.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Sony M9 (IPS FALD) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the Sony M9 (IPS FALD) is suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is suitable for print photo editing while the Sony M9 (IPS FALD) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
7.7
7.3
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
3000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
420 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
432 nits
2000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
695 nits
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
67.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) and Sony M9 (IPS FALD) are both good for casual gaming.
Competitive Gaming
5.4
5.7
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
2.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
60,240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
24 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
420 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
432 nits
The Sony M9 (IPS FALD) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Media Consumption
7.1
7.5
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
3000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
420 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
432 nits
2000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
695 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Sony M9 (IPS FALD) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are both good for media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) and Sony M9 (IPS FALD) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) and the Sony M9 (IPS FALD) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) | Sony M9 (IPS FALD) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$1,024 | $800 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 49" | 27" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 5120 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | Mini LED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | VA | IPS FALD | |
Local Dimming Zones | |||
Local Dimming Zones | 2048 | 96 | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 3000:1 | 1000:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 420 nits | 432 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 2000 nits | 695 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | Yes | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 85.5 % | 100 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 2 ms | 8 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 60,240 Hz | 24 - 144 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 8/10 | 6.6/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 9/10 | 7.6/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 109 PPI | 163 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 7/10 | 8/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7/10 | 8/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 1 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 2 | 2 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) vs. Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) vs. LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)
VS
Compare Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) vs. Asus PA329C (IPS)
VS
Compare Sony M9 (IPS FALD) vs. KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED)
VS
Compare Sony M9 (IPS FALD) vs. Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED)
VS
Compare Sony M9 (IPS FALD) vs. MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
