If you prioritize high refresh rates and excellent contrast for immersive gaming and media, the MSI MPG 271QRX with its QD-OLED panel is suitable for vibrant colors and deep blacks. It's better for HDR content and has a larger screen size. However, if budget is a concern and you mainly engage in competitive gaming where speed is critical, the ViewSonic XG2431 with its high refresh rate will perform well, even though it has a smaller screen and lower resolution. Both choices offer good color accuracy for photo editing; however, the MSI excels in color volume, making it more suitable for serious creative work. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the MSI MPG 271QRX (QD-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class for media consumption
Best in class refresh rate
Good image clarity
Best in class contrast
Best in class brightness
Best in class color volume
Best in class response time
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS)
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the MSI MPG 271QRX (QD-OLED).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
10.0/10
5.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
78.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MPG 271QRX (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
10.0/10
6.9/10
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.5 ms
48 - 360 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
The MSI MPG 271QRX (QD-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is only fair.
Productivity
6.0/10
5.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MPG 271QRX (QD-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
9.8/10
5.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MPG 271QRX (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$800
$245
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The MSI MPG 271QRX (QD-OLED) has a price of $800 and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) costs $245.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The MSI MPG 271QRX (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
Yes
No
The MSI MPG 271QRX (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The MSI MPG 271QRX (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the MSI MPG 271QRX (QD-OLED) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the MSI MPG 271QRX (QD-OLED) and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The ViewSonic XG2431 is an excellent gaming monitor, especially when used for HDR content. With top-notch video processing and a responsive 240 Hz on tap, it fulfills the needs of competitive players at an attractive price."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
120,200
Recommendations made
18,030
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.