A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
If you're looking for an immersive gaming experience with vibrant colors and deep blacks, the MSI MEG 342C with its QD-OLED panel is excellent for HDR gaming and media consumption. However, it falls short for productivity tasks. On the other hand, the ViewSonic XG2431 offers high responsiveness for competitive gaming at a more affordable price and is very suitable for productivity, though it doesn't match the MSI in HDR performance or color depth. So, if your budget allows and you prioritize visual quality, go for the MSI. If you prefer a budget-friendly monitor that's great for competitive gaming and work, choose the ViewSonic. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
- Best in class for casual gaming
- Excellent for media consumption
- Good image clarity
- Best in class contrast
- Best in class color volume
- Best in class response time
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS)
- Very good refresh rate
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.5
5.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
236 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
446 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
99.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
78.0 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
5.1
6.9
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.5 ms
20 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
236 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is poor.
Productivity
5.7
5.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
9.4
5.4
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
236 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
446 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$850
$245
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) has a price of $850 and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) costs $245.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) | ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$850 | $245 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 34" | 24" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 3440 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | OLED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | QD-OLED | IPS | |
Refresh Rate | |||
Refresh Rate | 175Hz | 240Hz | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | Inf:1 | 900:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 236 nits | 343 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 446 nits | 507 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | Yes | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 98.9 % | 99.5 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 1.4 ms | 7.5 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 20 - 175 Hz | 20 - 240 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | Yes | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 7.2/10 | 8/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 9.5/10 | 7.8/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 110 PPI | 93 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Glossy | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 6.6/10 | 6.3/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7.1/10 | 6.3/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 0 | 1 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 2 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Shopping
ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
Tom's Hardware
Christian Eberle | January 2022
"The ViewSonic XG2431 is an excellent gaming monitor, especially when used for HDR content. With top-notch video processing and a responsive 240 Hz on tap, it fulfills the needs of competitive players at an attractive price."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) vs. Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) vs. Dell U3223QE (IPS Black)
VS
Compare MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) vs. Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED)
VS
Compare ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) vs. MSI G273QPF (IPS)
VS
Compare ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) vs. Dell S2722DGM (VA)
VS
Compare ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) vs. Dell S3222DGM (VA)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,600
Recommendations made
16,140
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
