A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·
If you prioritize a wider screen for immersive gaming and multitasking, and are willing to invest in a premium monitor, the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 with its expansive curved display and superior contrast might be a great choice. However, if you prefer a more budget-friendly option that still delivers good color accuracy and a sharp image, suitable for both gaming and photo editing, the MSI MAG274QRF-QD is a solid option. The MSI monitor won't match the Samsung's performance for intense competitive gaming due to its slower response time, but it's very competent for casual play and productivity tasks. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS)
- The MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED).
Advantages of the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED)
- Good for casual gaming
- Good for media consumption
- Very good refresh rate
- Good contrast
- Good brightness
- Very good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.1
7.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1195:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
372 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
420 nits
390 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
2000 nits
96.7 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is good for casual gaming, while the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
6.0
7.1
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
1195:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
372 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
420 nits
390 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
2000 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is good for media consumption, while the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$436
$1,024
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) has a price of $436 and the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) costs $1,024.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
5.8
5.4
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
9.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
2.0 ms
20 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
60,240 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
372 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
420 nits
The MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Productivity
6.2
6.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) and MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) are both only fair for productivity.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
No
Both the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) and the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) | Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$436 | $1,024 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 27" | 49" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 5120 x 1440 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | LED | Mini LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | VA | |
Local Dimming Zones | |||
Local Dimming Zones | N/A | 2048 | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 1195:1 | 3000:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 372 nits | 420 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 390 nits | 2000 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 96.8 % | 85.5 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 9.1 ms | 2 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 20 - 165 Hz | 60,240 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | Yes | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 7.1/10 | 8/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 7.3/10 | 9/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 109 PPI | 109 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 2 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 2 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 1 | 0 | |
Shopping
MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
Tom's Hardware
Christian Eberle | April 2021
"The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD has the largest color gamut we’ve ever seen and near-perfect out-of-box accuracy. sRGB content will be oversaturated though, and HDR doesn’t do anything for image quality."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) vs. Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS)
VS
Compare MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) vs. Innocn 27M2U (IPS MiniLED)
VS
Compare MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) vs. Gigabyte M32Q (IPS)
VS
Compare Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) vs. Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) vs. LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)
VS
Compare Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) vs. Asus PA329C (IPS)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,300
Recommendations made
17,445
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
