A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
45GS96QB
Company ProductName Specs




34M2C8600
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If budget isn't a constraint and you're aiming for a larger screen size with OLED technology, the MSI monitor excels in competitive gaming with high refresh rates. However, for most users, the Philips offers excellent performance in HDR gaming and media consumption with exceptional color accuracy, making it a better value for those who prioritize these features and wish to save money without sacrificing quality. Both are well-suited for productivity and digital photo editing, but if the very best image clarity is your priority and cost is less of a concern, you might lean towards the MSI. If value and well-rounded performance are more important, the Philips is likely the wiser choice. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)
  • Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

2.7
45GS96QB
34M2C8600
5.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

5.4
45GS96QB
34M2C8600
9.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$1,700
45GS96QB
34M2C8600
$800
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) has a price of $1,700 and the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) costs $800.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
45GS96QB
34M2C8600
Yes
The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
45GS96QB
34M2C8600
9.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.3 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

5.9
45GS96QB
34M2C8600
5.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
45GS96QB
34M2C8600
Yes
Both the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
45GS96QB
34M2C8600
Yes
Both the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
45GS96QB
34M2C8600
Yes
Both the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) and the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)
MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,700
$800
Screen Size
45"34"
Resolution
3440 x 1440 3440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz175Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
275 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
Unknown148.8 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms0.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz48 - 175 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/107.2/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
1.4/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
2.5/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo