A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
DualUp 28MQ780
Company ProductName Specs




MEG 342C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If budget is a concern and you prioritize digital photo editing or productivity tasks due to the unique 16:18 aspect ratio, the LG DualUp may be suitable for you, although it generally won't deliver a strong gaming experience. On the other hand, if you're willing to invest more for an immersive gaming and media experience, the MSI MEG offers superior image quality, better brightness, and is suitable for HDR gaming. It also boasts a wider color gamut that benefits print photo editing, but its ultrawide format might be less optimal for traditional productivity tasks. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good text clarity
Advantages of the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Excellent for media consumption
  • Good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class color volume
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
DualUp 28MQ780
MEG 342C
9.5
2560 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
98.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.5 %
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

7.7
DualUp 28MQ780
MEG 342C
5.7
2560 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is good for productivity, while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

6.5
DualUp 28MQ780
MEG 342C
9.4
2560 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is only fair.

Cost

$650
DualUp 28MQ780
MEG 342C
$850
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) has a price of $650 and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) costs $850.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
DualUp 28MQ780
MEG 342C
Yes
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
DualUp 28MQ780
MEG 342C
No
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
DualUp 28MQ780
MEG 342C
Yes
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

4.9
DualUp 28MQ780
MEG 342C
5.1
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
10.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.4 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
DualUp 28MQ780
MEG 342C
No
Both the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$650
$850
Screen Size
28"34"
Resolution
2560 x 28803440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz175Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits236 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown446 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %98.9 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
10 ms1.4 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A20 - 175 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/107.2/10
Ghosting Score
7.1/109.5/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
139 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteGlossy
Text Clarity Score
7.9/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo