A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
45GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




S43CG70
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you're an avid gamer seeking an immersive experience with a wide aspect ratio, deeper blacks, and high responsiveness, the LG W-OLED monitor is a great choice but it comes at a higher price. On the other hand, the Samsung VA Mini LED offers a sharper image and performs well for general productivity and media consumption, all at a lower cost. For HDR gaming and media, the LG's OLED technology outperforms the Samsung, but the Samsung's larger color gamut could be better for photo editing tasks. If budget is a concern and you need a monitor for diverse uses, the Samsung might be the better option. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
Advantages of the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED)
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
45GS95QE
S43CG70
7.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is good.

Competitive Gaming

6.0
45GS95QE
S43CG70
4.9
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
60,144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
The LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is poor.

Productivity

3.9
45GS95QE
S43CG70
5.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
84 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
103 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) and LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

5.9
45GS95QE
S43CG70
6.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$1,700
45GS95QE
S43CG70
$999
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,700 and the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) costs $999.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
45GS95QE
S43CG70
No
The LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
45GS95QE
S43CG70
No
The LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
45GS95QE
S43CG70
No
Both the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) and Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
45GS95QE
S43CG70
Yes
Both the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) and Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) and the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED)Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED)
LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED)Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,700
$999
Screen Size
45"43"
Resolution
3440 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDMini LED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDVA
Local Dimming Zones
N/A512

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:13000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits400 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
Unknown99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz60,144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
10/109.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
84 PPI103 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
4/106.8/10
Image Clarity Score
5.1/106.8/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,600
Recommendations made
16,140
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo