A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
38WN95C
Company ProductName Specs




M9
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize a large, ultrawide screen for multitasking and an immersive gaming or media consumption experience, the LG monitor is a solid choice, despite its higher price. However, if high-resolution content creation or HDR gaming is essential for you, and you're looking for better overall image quality at a lower price, the Sony monitor may serve you better, as it also offers excellent image clarity and is well-suited for HDR video editing. Keep in mind, though, that Sony's screen is smaller and less wide, which could impact multitasking capabilities. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 38WN95C (IPS)
  • The LG 38WN95C (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Sony M9 (IPS FALD).
Advantages of the Sony M9 (IPS FALD)
  • Good for casual gaming
  • Best in class for productivity
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good text clarity
  • Very good image clarity
  • Good contrast
  • Good color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

6.1
38WN95C
M9
7.3
3840 x 1600
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
898:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
477 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
432 nits
692 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
695 nits
94.1 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
67.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Sony M9 (IPS FALD) is good for casual gaming, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

Competitive Gaming

4.5
38WN95C
M9
5.7
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
7.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
24 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
477 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
432 nits
The Sony M9 (IPS FALD) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Sony M9 (IPS FALD) is somewhat better.

Productivity

6.6
38WN95C
M9
9.6
3840 x 1600
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Sony M9 (IPS FALD) is best in class for productivity, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

Media Consumption

6.2
38WN95C
M9
7.5
3840 x 1600
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
898:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
477 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
432 nits
692 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
695 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Sony M9 (IPS FALD) is good for media consumption, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

Cost

$950
38WN95C
M9
$800
Product image
Product image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

The LG 38WN95C (IPS) has a price of $950 and the Sony M9 (IPS FALD) costs $800.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
38WN95C
M9
Yes
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Sony M9 (IPS FALD) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
38WN95C
M9
Yes
Both the LG 38WN95C (IPS) and Sony M9 (IPS FALD) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
38WN95C
M9
No
Both the LG 38WN95C (IPS) and Sony M9 (IPS FALD) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
38WN95C
M9
No
Both the LG 38WN95C (IPS) and Sony M9 (IPS FALD) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 38WN95C (IPS) and the Sony M9 (IPS FALD) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 38WN95C (IPS)Sony M9 (IPS FALD)
LG 38WN95C (IPS)Sony M9 (IPS FALD)

GENERAL

Price
$950
$800
Screen Size
38"27"
Resolution
3840 x 16003840 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS FALD
Local Dimming Zones
496

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
898:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
477 nits432 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
692 nits695 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
7.1 ms8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 144 Hz24 - 144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
6.6/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
7.9/107.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.2/108/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
01
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo