A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
34WQ73A
Company ProductName Specs




XG321UG
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If budget is a primary concern and you're mainly using the monitor for routine productivity and casual gaming, the LG 34WQ73A offers a wider screen with a 21:9 aspect ratio at a lower cost. However, if you're looking for superior image clarity with better brightness and color accuracy, and are involved in tasks like HDR video editing, the ViewSonic XG321UG might be worth the extra investment. The ViewSonic also has a higher resolution and is better suited for print photo editing, but remember that it comes at a premium price. If you're a competitive gamer, neither of these monitors is ideal due to their limited refresh rates. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
  • The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) has no clear advantages over the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED).
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good brightness
  • Very good response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
34WQ73A
XG321UG
6.4
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
Unknown
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is only fair for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

3.8
34WQ73A
XG321UG
4.6
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
10.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
3.6 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48,144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

6.0
34WQ73A
XG321UG
7.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
137 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is good for productivity, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is only fair.

Media Consumption

5.9
34WQ73A
XG321UG
6.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$400
34WQ73A
XG321UG
$2,300
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) has a price of $400 and the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) costs $2,300.

Key similarities

Chevron down

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
34WQ73A
XG321UG
No
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

No
34WQ73A
XG321UG
No
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are not suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
34WQ73A
XG321UG
No
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
34WQ73A
XG321UG
Yes
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED)
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED)

GENERAL

Price
$400
$2,300
Screen Size
34"32"
Resolution
3440 x 14403440 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDMini LED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A1152

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits400 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown1400 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
10 ms3.6 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48,144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
7.1/108.4/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
110 PPI137 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.1/107.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7.1/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo