A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
34WQ73A
Company ProductName Specs




S43CG70
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you're focused on a budget while still seeking a good monitor for general productivity and print photo editing, the LG 34WQ73A with its ultrawide aspect ratio and wide color gamut will serve you well. However, if you're willing to invest more for a larger screen, better contrast, and improved overall image clarity, especially for media consumption even though it falls short for gaming, then the Samsung S43CG70 with its higher resolution and Mini LED technology might be the right pick. Keep in mind, though, the LG's smaller size may be more manageable on a typical desk and its ultrawide format is great for multitasking. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
Advantages of the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED)
  • Good for casual gaming
  • Good contrast
  • Good brightness
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
34WQ73A
S43CG70
7.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Unknown
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is good for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

3.8
34WQ73A
S43CG70
4.9
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
10.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
60,144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
The Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

5.9
34WQ73A
S43CG70
6.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$400
34WQ73A
S43CG70
$999
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) has a price of $400 and the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) costs $999.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

6.0
34WQ73A
S43CG70
5.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
103 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 34WQ73A (IPS) to be only fair for productivity, while the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is poor.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
34WQ73A
S43CG70
No
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

No
34WQ73A
S43CG70
No
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
34WQ73A
S43CG70
No
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
34WQ73A
S43CG70
Yes
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED)
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED)

GENERAL

Price
$400
$999
Screen Size
34"43"
Resolution
3440 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDMini LED
Screen Sub-type
IPSVA
Local Dimming Zones
N/A512

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:13000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits400 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
10 ms1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A60,144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
7.1/109.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
110 PPI103 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.1/106.8/10
Image Clarity Score
7.1/106.8/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo