A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
34WQ73A
Company ProductName Specs




27E1N8900
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If affordability is a priority and you prefer an ultrawide screen for multitasking or immersive casual gaming, the LG monitor is a good option, but its refresh rate and response time are not ideal for competitive gaming, and it's not suitable for high dynamic range (HDR) content. On the other hand, the Philips offers superior image quality with better colors, contrast, and clarity, making it excellent for HDR gaming and media consumption, as well as tasks like digital photo and print editing. However, it is more expensive and has a standard widescreen format rather than ultrawide. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
Advantages of the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Good brightness
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
34WQ73A
27E1N8900
9.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Unknown
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

3.8
34WQ73A
27E1N8900
5.9
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
10.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

6.0
34WQ73A
27E1N8900
6.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both only fair for productivity, though the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

5.9
34WQ73A
27E1N8900
9.5
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$400
34WQ73A
27E1N8900
$800
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) has a price of $400 and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) costs $800.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
34WQ73A
27E1N8900
Yes
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

No
34WQ73A
27E1N8900
Yes
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
34WQ73A
27E1N8900
No
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
34WQ73A
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$400
$800
Screen Size
34"27"
Resolution
3440 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits540 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %150 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
10 ms0.1 ms
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/105/10
Ghosting Score
7.1/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
110 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.1/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7.1/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo