A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
34WQ73A
Company ProductName Specs




MEG 342C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If budget is a major concern and you primarily engage in casual gaming or productivity, the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is a cost-effective option with a decent balance of features and performance. On the other hand, if you're serious about competitive gaming, or highly value your experience watching HDR content and editing photos, the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) excels with superior contrast, color performance, and faster response times, though it comes at a premium price. Keep in mind that the LG's IPS panel might offer better viewing angles, while the MSI's QD-OLED is unparalleled for deep blacks and vibrant colors. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
Advantages of the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Excellent for media consumption
  • Good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class color volume
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
34WQ73A
MEG 342C
9.5
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
Unknown
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.5 %
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

3.8
34WQ73A
MEG 342C
5.1
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
10.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.4 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

5.9
34WQ73A
MEG 342C
9.4
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$400
34WQ73A
MEG 342C
$850
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) has a price of $400 and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) costs $850.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
34WQ73A
MEG 342C
Yes
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

6.0
34WQ73A
MEG 342C
5.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Glossy
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 34WQ73A (IPS) to be only fair for productivity, while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is poor.

Digital Photo Editing

No
34WQ73A
MEG 342C
No
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
34WQ73A
MEG 342C
No
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
34WQ73A
MEG 342C
Yes
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$400
$850
Screen Size
34"34"
Resolution
3440 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz175Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits236 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown446 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %98.9 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
10 ms1.4 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A20 - 175 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/107.2/10
Ghosting Score
7.1/109.5/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
110 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteGlossy
Text Clarity Score
7.1/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
7.1/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo