A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
34WQ73A
Company ProductName Specs




DualUp 28MQ780
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If your focus is on a wider screen for immersive casual gaming and productivity, the LG 34WQ73A with its ultrawide aspect ratio could be the better choice, and it's also less expensive. On the other hand, if you prioritize vertical screen real estate for tasks like coding or writing, which can benefit from a unique, square-like screen, the LG DualUp 28MQ780 might be more suitable despite its higher price. Neither monitor is ideal for competitive gaming due to their lower refresh rates, and both only offer basic HDR support, so they wouldn't be the best options if HDR gaming and media consumption are important to you. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
  • The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) has no clear advantages over the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS).
Advantages of the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)
  • Good for productivity

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

3.8
34WQ73A
DualUp 28MQ780
4.9
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
10.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is somewhat better.

Productivity

6.0
34WQ73A
DualUp 28MQ780
7.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is good for productivity, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is only fair.

Media Consumption

5.9
34WQ73A
DualUp 28MQ780
6.5
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$400
34WQ73A
DualUp 28MQ780
$650
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) has a price of $400 and the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) costs $650.

Digital Photo Editing

No
34WQ73A
DualUp 28MQ780
Yes
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
34WQ73A
DualUp 28MQ780
No
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
34WQ73A
DualUp 28MQ780
5.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Unknown
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
34WQ73A
DualUp 28MQ780
No
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
34WQ73A
DualUp 28MQ780
No
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$400
$650
Screen Size
34"28"
Resolution
3440 x 14402560 x 2880
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Refresh Rate
60Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
10 ms10 ms
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/105/10
Ghosting Score
7.1/107.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
110 PPI139 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.1/107.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7.1/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo