A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
34WQ73A
Company ProductName Specs




45GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

For a tighter budget, the LG 34WQ73A with its IPS panel is a practical pick for average gaming, productivity, and everyday use; its larger screen enhances multitasking with decent color accuracy for general photo editing. By contrast, if you prioritize a more immersive and high-refresh-rate gaming experience, the LG 45GS95QE's OLED technology offers deeper blacks and more vivid colors, making it excellent for HDR gaming and media, though at a premium price. However, the 45GS95QE may not be as suitable for productivity tasks due to lower text clarity and a glossy screen that could reflect more light. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
34WQ73A
45GS95QE
9.6
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Unknown
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

3.8
34WQ73A
45GS95QE
6.0
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
10.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
The LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

6.0
34WQ73A
45GS95QE
3.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
84 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$400
34WQ73A
45GS95QE
$1,700
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) has a price of $400 and the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,700.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
34WQ73A
45GS95QE
Yes
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

No
34WQ73A
45GS95QE
Yes
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Media Consumption

5.9
34WQ73A
45GS95QE
5.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
34WQ73A
45GS95QE
No
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
34WQ73A
45GS95QE
Yes
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED)
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$400
$1,700
Screen Size
34"45"
Resolution
3440 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits200 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %Unknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
10 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/108/10
Ghosting Score
7.1/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
110 PPI84 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.1/104/10
Image Clarity Score
7.1/105.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo