A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
34WQ73A
Company ProductName Specs




45GR95QE-B
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

For casual gaming and productivity with a tighter budget, the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is a good choice due to its lower price; however, the IPS panel may not offer the best contrast and is not suitable for high-end HDR gaming or media. On the other hand, if you are willing to invest more for a premium gaming or media experience, the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) provides superior contrast and is well-suited for HDR content, but the higher cost and potential burn-in risk associated with OLED screens are factors to consider. If digital photo editing is important, note that the W-OLED monitor has a better color gamut coverage. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED)
  • Good for casual gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Very good response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
34WQ73A
45GR95QE-B
7.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
665 nits
Unknown
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.9 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is good for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

3.8
34WQ73A
45GR95QE-B
5.3
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
10.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
2.7 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
The LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

6.0
34WQ73A
45GR95QE-B
3.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
84 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$400
34WQ73A
45GR95QE-B
$1,700
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) has a price of $400 and the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) costs $1,700.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
34WQ73A
45GR95QE-B
Yes
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

No
34WQ73A
45GR95QE-B
Yes
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
34WQ73A
45GR95QE-B
No
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Media Consumption

5.9
34WQ73A
45GR95QE-B
5.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
665 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are both poor for media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
34WQ73A
45GR95QE-B
No
Both the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED)
LG 34WQ73A (IPS)LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$400
$1,700
Screen Size
34"45"
Resolution
3440 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits203 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown665 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %99.9 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
10 ms2.7 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A20 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/108/10
Ghosting Score
7.1/108.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
110 PPI84 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.1/104/10
Image Clarity Score
7.1/105.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo