A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
34GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




27E1N8900
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize a large, ultrawide screen for an immersive gaming and media consumption experience, the LG monitor is well-suited for you, although it comes at a higher price. In contrast, the Phillips offers a crisper, higher resolution on a smaller screen, which is better for productivity and detailed photo editing at a lower cost. Both have OLED panels, delivering excellent contrast and color depth. The LG has a higher refresh rate, beneficial for competitive gaming, but the Phillips has more USB ports for connectivity. If budget is less of a concern and gaming is your focus, go for the LG; if you need a versatile monitor that balances work and play at a more affordable price, choose the Phillips. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

5.7
34GS95QE
27E1N8900
6.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.8
34GS95QE
27E1N8900
9.5
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,300
34GS95QE
27E1N8900
$800
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,300 and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) costs $800.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
34GS95QE
27E1N8900
9.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

6.3
34GS95QE
27E1N8900
5.9
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) to be only fair for competitive gaming, while the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is poor.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
34GS95QE
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
34GS95QE
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
34GS95QE
27E1N8900
No
Both the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
34GS95QE
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,300
$800
Screen Size
34"27"
Resolution
3440 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
275 nits540 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
Unknown150 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms0.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/105/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo