A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
34GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




MPG 321URX
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize a larger, ultra-wide screen for immersive gaming and multi-tasking, the LG 34GS95QE is suitable, though its lower resolution might not be as sharp for productivity. The MSI MPG 321URX, with a higher resolution and color accuracy, excels in HDR gaming, media consumption, and professional photo and video editing. Despite being slightly less expensive, it offers better brightness and a standard aspect ratio that is versatile for both gaming and general use. Both have OLED technology, ensuring deep blacks and fast response times, but you'll experience richer colors and a crisper image with the MSI, albeit on a smaller screen. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED).
Advantages of the MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

5.7
34GS95QE
MPG 321URX
7.6
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED) is good for productivity, while the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.8
34GS95QE
MPG 321URX
10.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,300
34GS95QE
MPG 321URX
$950
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,300 and the MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED) costs $950.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
34GS95QE
MPG 321URX
Yes
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
34GS95QE
MPG 321URX
9.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

6.3
34GS95QE
MPG 321URX
6.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are both only fair for competitive gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
34GS95QE
MPG 321URX
Yes
Both the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
34GS95QE
MPG 321URX
Yes
Both the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
34GS95QE
MPG 321URX
Yes
Both the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and the MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED)
LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,300
$950
Screen Size
34"32"
Resolution
3440 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
275 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
Unknown138.2 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI139 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo