A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·
If you're looking for an immersive experience with a wider screen and higher contrast, particularly for dramatic visual content or atmospheric games, the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 with its larger screen and better contrast could be a solid choice. However, it comes at a premium price. On the other hand, the LG 34GP83A offers respectable performance for gaming and productivity at a significantly lower cost. It provides good overall image quality and is suitable for tasks like digital photo editing. But for competitive gaming, the Samsung with its higher refresh rate would be the better fit, although this comes with a higher cost. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34GP83A (IPS)
- The LG 34GP83A (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED).
Advantages of the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED)
- Good for casual gaming
- Good for media consumption
- Very good refresh rate
- Good text clarity
- Good image clarity
- Good contrast
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.9
7.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
956:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
389 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
420 nits
457 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
2000 nits
95.2 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is good for casual gaming, while the LG 34GP83A (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
4.5
5.4
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
6.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
2.0 ms
20 - 160 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
60,240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
389 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
420 nits
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) and LG 34GP83A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is somewhat better.
Productivity
6.0
6.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) and LG 34GP83A (IPS) are both only fair for productivity, though the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
5.9
7.1
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
956:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
389 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
420 nits
457 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
2000 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 34GP83A (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$750
$1,024
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The LG 34GP83A (IPS) has a price of $750 and the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) costs $1,024.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The LG 34GP83A (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The LG 34GP83A (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the LG 34GP83A (IPS) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 34GP83A (IPS) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 34GP83A (IPS) and the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| LG 34GP83A (IPS) | Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$750 | $1,024 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 34" | 49" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 3440 x 1440 | 5120 x 1440 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | LED | Mini LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | VA | |
Local Dimming Zones | |||
Local Dimming Zones | N/A | 2048 | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 956:1 | 3000:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 389 nits | 420 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 457 nits | 2000 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 102.8 % | 85.5 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 6.1 ms | 2 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 20 - 160 Hz | 60,240 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 6.6/10 | 8/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 8.1/10 | 9/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 108 PPI | 109 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 2 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 2 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Shopping
LG 34GP83A (IPS)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
Display Ninja
Rob Shafer | October 2023
"The LG 34GP83A is an excellent monitor for the price! It offers flawless performance thanks to its rapid response time, low input lag, high refresh rate, and certified G-SYNC compatibility. Moreover, its Nano IPS panel ensures vibrant colors which along with the 3440×1440 ultrawide resolution makes for a stunning and immersive viewing experience."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare LG 34GP83A (IPS) vs. LG 34GN850B (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 34GP83A (IPS) vs. MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare LG 34GP83A (IPS) vs. Dell Alienware AW3821DW (IPS)
VS
Compare Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) vs. Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) vs. LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)
VS
Compare Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) vs. Asus PA329C (IPS)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
