A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
If you value larger screen real estate and a widescreen format, which can be great for multitasking and immersive media experiences, the LG 34WQ73A is a solid choice, but it's not ideal for HDR gaming and media consumption. On the other hand, if a higher resolution for sharp image detail is important to you, especially for tasks like photo editing, the LG 32UN650 may be a better option, although its performance in gaming might be lacking due to its lower refresh rate and response time. Neither monitor is particularly well-suited for competitive gaming, where high refresh rates and fast response times are crucial. If print photo editing is a key use for you, note that both monitors may not fully meet your needs in terms of color accuracy and gamut coverage. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32UN650 (IPS)
- Very good for productivity
- Good for media consumption
- Very good contrast
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
- Good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.6
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
3229:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
298 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
373 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
78.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32UN650 (IPS) is only fair for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
8.4
6.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32UN650 (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
7.1
5.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
3229:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
298 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
373 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32UN650 (IPS) is good for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The LG 32UN650 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
3.8
3.8
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
11.8 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
20 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
298 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG 32UN650 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Cost
$500
$470
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
The LG 32UN650 (IPS) has a price of $500 and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) costs $470.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the LG 32UN650 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
No
Both the LG 32UN650 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 32UN650 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 32UN650 (IPS) and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| LG 32UN650 (IPS) | LG 34WQ73A (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$500 | $470 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 32" | 34" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3440 x 1440 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | LED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | IPS | |
Refresh Rate | |||
Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 3229:1 | 1000:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 298 nits | 300 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 373 nits | Unknown | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 98.6 % | 99 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 11.8 ms | 10 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 20 - 165 Hz | N/A | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | Yes | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 6.5/10 | 7.1/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 139 PPI | 110 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 7.9/10 | 7.1/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7.9/10 | 7.1/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 2 | 2 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Shopping
LG 32UN650 (IPS)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
Display Ninja
Rob Shafer | February 2024
"The LG 32UN650 is a 32″ 4K IPS monitor with gorgeous colors and wide viewing angles. Additionally, it supports FreeSync, HDR and has a stylish design with a height-adjustable stand. Overall, it is an excellent monitor for casual PC and console gaming, light office work and content creation – and everything in between! However, there are better and cheaper alternatives available."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare LG 32UN650 (IPS) vs. KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED)
VS
Compare LG 32UN650 (IPS) vs. Dell AW2524H (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 32UN650 (IPS) vs. Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 34WQ73A (IPS) vs. Gigabyte M28U (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 34WQ73A (IPS) vs. Asus PA279CRV (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 34WQ73A (IPS) vs. Gigabyte M32Q (IPS)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
126,800
Recommendations made
19,020
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
