A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32GS95UE
Company ProductName Specs




XG272 2K OLED
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

Considering the higher price of the LG 32GS95UE, you're paying for a larger screen and higher resolution which benefits productivity and media consumption. However, the ViewSonic XG272 has a lower price and still offers excellent color and contrast, making it a strong choice for both gaming and media. For competitive gaming, both have similar high refresh rates and response times. If budget is a priority and you mostly game or consume media, the ViewSonic might be the better value. Choose the LG if you need a larger, higher-resolution display for detailed work and are willing to spend more. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

6.2
32GS95UE
XG272 2K OLED
9.6
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
40 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
450 nits
The ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is only fair.

Productivity

7.0
32GS95UE
XG272 2K OLED
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
140 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is good for productivity, while the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$1,100
32GS95UE
XG272 2K OLED
$900
Product image
Product image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

$1,800

The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,100 and the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) costs $900.

Digital Photo Editing

No
32GS95UE
XG272 2K OLED
Yes
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
32GS95UE
XG272 2K OLED
9.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
450 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Media Consumption

8.5
32GS95UE
XG272 2K OLED
8.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
450 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) are both very good for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
32GS95UE
XG272 2K OLED
Yes
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32GS95UE
XG272 2K OLED
No
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
32GS95UE
XG272 2K OLED
Yes
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED)
LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,100
$900
Screen Size
32"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
275 nits450 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
98.5 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.3 ms0.02 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz40 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
9.9/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
140 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo