A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32GS95UE
Company ProductName Specs




MEG 342C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you're looking for a monitor primarily for HDR gaming and media consumption with top-notch color accuracy for print photo editing, the LG 32GS95UE with its high contrast and wide color gamut might seem appealing despite its higher cost. However, the MSI MEG 342C offers a very good gaming experience with better image clarity due to its glossy screen and superior competitive gaming features such as lower total response time and higher refresh rate. For productivity and media consumption with a wider, immersive aspect ratio at a lower price, the MSI could be more suitable. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
  • Excellent for media consumption
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

6.2
32GS95UE
MEG 342C
5.1
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.4 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

7.0
32GS95UE
MEG 342C
5.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
140 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is good for productivity, while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

8.5
32GS95UE
MEG 342C
9.4
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is very good.

Cost

$1,100
32GS95UE
MEG 342C
$850
Product image
Product image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

$1,800

The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,100 and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) costs $850.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
32GS95UE
MEG 342C
9.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.5 %
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
32GS95UE
MEG 342C
Yes
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

No
32GS95UE
MEG 342C
No
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32GS95UE
MEG 342C
No
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
32GS95UE
MEG 342C
Yes
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,100
$850
Screen Size
32"34"
Resolution
3840 x 21603440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz175Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
275 nits236 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown446 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
98.5 %98.9 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.3 ms1.4 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz20 - 175 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/107.2/10
Ghosting Score
9.9/109.5/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
140 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteGlossy
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo