A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32GS95UE
Company ProductName Specs




MAG 271QPX
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If budget is a concern, the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) offers a high refresh rate and outstanding contrast at a more affordable price, making it a great fit for competitive gaming and HDR media consumption. However, if you're after a larger screen with a higher resolution and are willing to pay a premium, the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is better suited for tasks that require more screen real estate and finer details, such as productivity and media consumption, despite its lower refresh rate compared to the MSI. Both monitors excel in delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors due to their OLED technology. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
Advantages of the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Best in class refresh rate
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

6.2
32GS95UE
MAG 271QPX
10.0
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 360 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is only fair.

Productivity

7.0
32GS95UE
MAG 271QPX
6.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
140 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is good for productivity, while the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is only fair.

Media Consumption

8.5
32GS95UE
MAG 271QPX
9.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is very good.

Cost

$1,100
32GS95UE
MAG 271QPX
$750
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,100 and the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) costs $750.

Digital Photo Editing

No
32GS95UE
MAG 271QPX
Yes
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32GS95UE
MAG 271QPX
Yes
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
32GS95UE
MAG 271QPX
10.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.1 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
32GS95UE
MAG 271QPX
Yes
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
32GS95UE
MAG 271QPX
Yes
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)
LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,100
$750
Screen Size
32"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz360Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
275 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
98.5 %138.4 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.3 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz48 - 360 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/109.5/10
Ghosting Score
9.9/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
140 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo