A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32GQ950
Company ProductName Specs




G274QPF-QD
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're a competitive gamer looking for smooth gameplay and high refresh rates, the MSI G274QPF-QD will suffice and save you money. However, if you prioritize media consumption and productivity with sharper images and better color accuracy, the LG 32GQ950 offers a larger screen and higher resolution, but at a premium price. It's not as well-suited for HDR gaming, unlike the MSI which despite its lower resolution, supports a wider color gamut needed for photo editing and print work. So, choose LG for a high-quality, versatile display or MSI for cost-effective gaming performance with decent capabilities for creative tasks. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GQ950 (IPS)
  • Very good for productivity
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
  • Very good response time
Advantages of the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS)
  • The MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) has no clear advantages over the LG 32GQ950 (IPS).

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

4.7
32GQ950
G274QPF-QD
5.8
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
5.8 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
20 - 160 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 170 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
367 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is somewhat better.

Productivity

8.1
32GQ950
G274QPF-QD
6.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
108 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is only fair.

Media Consumption

6.6
32GQ950
G274QPF-QD
5.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
921:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
367 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
1007 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$930
32GQ950
G274QPF-QD
$270
Product image
Product image

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) has a price of $930 and the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) costs $270.

Print Photo Editing

No
32GQ950
G274QPF-QD
Yes
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

6.2
32GQ950
G274QPF-QD
5.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
921:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
367 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
1007 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
94.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 32GQ950 (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is poor.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
32GQ950
G274QPF-QD
No
Both the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
32GQ950
G274QPF-QD
Yes
Both the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32GQ950
G274QPF-QD
No
Both the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 32GQ950 (IPS)MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS)
LG 32GQ950 (IPS)MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$930
$270
Screen Size
32"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
32N/A

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
921:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
367 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
1007 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99.5 %154 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
5.8 ms8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 160 Hz48 - 170 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7/107.1/10
Ghosting Score
8.1/107.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
139 PPI108 PPI
Coating
Semi-GlossMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.9/107/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo