A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32GQ950
Company ProductName Specs




45GS96QB
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize a high screen resolution and excellent color accuracy for tasks like digital photo editing, the LG 32GQ950 with its 4K display and strong sRGB color gamut coverage is a solid choice, yet its contrast is poor, not making it ideal for HDR gaming or media. On the other hand, the MSI 45GS96QB, despite being more expensive, offers a superior contrast ratio with its OLED panel, making it excellent for competitive gaming and enjoying HDR content, but its lower screen resolution and potential for image retention might be a drawback for productivity tasks. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GQ950 (IPS)
  • Very good for productivity
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
Advantages of the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

6.2
32GQ950
45GS96QB
9.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
921:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
367 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
1007 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
94.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair.

Competitive Gaming

4.7
32GQ950
45GS96QB
5.9
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
5.8 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
20 - 160 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
367 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

8.1
32GQ950
45GS96QB
2.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

6.6
32GQ950
45GS96QB
5.4
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
921:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
367 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
1007 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$930
32GQ950
45GS96QB
$1,700
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) has a price of $930 and the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) costs $1,700.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
32GQ950
45GS96QB
Yes
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

No
32GQ950
45GS96QB
Yes
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
32GQ950
45GS96QB
Yes
Both the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32GQ950
45GS96QB
No
Both the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 32GQ950 (IPS)MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)
LG 32GQ950 (IPS)MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$930
$1,700
Screen Size
32"45"
Resolution
3840 x 21603440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Local Dimming Zones
32N/A

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
921:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
367 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
1007 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99.5 %Unknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
5.8 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 160 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7/108/10
Ghosting Score
8.1/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
139 PPI
Coating
Semi-GlossMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.9/101.4/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/102.5/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
118,100
Recommendations made
17,715
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo