If you prioritize sharp image quality and a larger screen suited for productivity and digital photo editing, the LG 32GQ950 with its higher resolution and good color accuracy is a solid option. However, if you're looking for an immersive gaming experience with superior contrast for HDR gaming and media consumption, the LG 45GR95QE-B excels due to its OLED panel and wider aspect ratio, despite its lower resolution and larger screen size which might not be as clear for text-heavy tasks. The 45GR95QE-B also offers a higher refresh rate, beneficial for competitive gaming, yet it costs more. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GQ950 (IPS)
Very good for productivity
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED)
Good for casual gaming
Very good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.2/10
7.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
921:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
367 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
1007 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
665 nits
94.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.9 %
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is good for casual gaming, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
4.7/10
5.3/10
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
5.8 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
2.7 ms
20 - 160 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
367 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
The LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is somewhat better.
Productivity
8.1/10
3.9/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
84 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.6/10
5.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
921:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
367 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
1007 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
665 nits
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is poor.
Cost
$999
$1,700
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) has a price of $999 and the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) costs $1,700.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
94,100
Recommendations made
14,115
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.