A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32GQ950
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ73A
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're looking for a monitor with higher resolution and better performance for both gaming and media consumption, the LG 32GQ950 with a higher refresh rate and HDR capabilities stands out, albeit at a premium price. However, if you prioritize a wider screen for multitasking and productivity while saving money, the LG 34WQ73A with its ultrawide aspect ratio could be the smarter choice, though it lacks the superior gaming and media features of the LG 32GQ950. Consider if gaming performance and HDR content are worth the higher expense to you, or if productivity and cost savings are your main concerns. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GQ950 (IPS)
  • Very good for productivity
  • Good refresh rate
  • Very good response time
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
  • The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) has no clear advantages over the LG 32GQ950 (IPS).

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

4.7
32GQ950
34WQ73A
3.8
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
5.8 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
20 - 160 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
367 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is somewhat better.

Productivity

8.1
32GQ950
34WQ73A
6.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is only fair.

Media Consumption

6.6
32GQ950
34WQ73A
5.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
921:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
367 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
1007 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$930
32GQ950
34WQ73A
$400
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) has a price of $930 and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) costs $400.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
32GQ950
34WQ73A
No
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
32GQ950
34WQ73A
Yes
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

6.2
32GQ950
34WQ73A
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
921:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
367 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
1007 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
94.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
Unknown
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 32GQ950 (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
32GQ950
34WQ73A
No
Both the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32GQ950
34WQ73A
No
Both the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 32GQ950 (IPS)LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
LG 32GQ950 (IPS)LG 34WQ73A (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$930
$400
Screen Size
32"34"
Resolution
3840 x 21603440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
32N/A

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
921:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
367 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
1007 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99.5 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
5.8 ms10 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 160 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7/105/10
Ghosting Score
8.1/107.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
139 PPI110 PPI
Coating
Semi-GlossMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.9/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo