A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32GP850
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ73A
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

The LG 32GP850 is suitable for users looking for a good gaming experience, thanks to its higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate (VRR) support, which reduces screen tearing. It's decent for photo editing with a high sRGB coverage but isn't ideal for HDR gaming or video editing due to its lower HDR peak brightness. On the other hand, the LG 34WQ73A has a larger, ultra-wide screen which can enhance productivity and immersion in movies, but its lower refresh rate and lack of advanced gaming features like VRR make it less optimal for competitive gaming. It also has excellent USB connectivity, which might appeal to professionals looking for a versatile workspace. If budget is a concern, the 32GP850 is the less expensive option while still offering solid gaming and photo editing performance. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
  • Good refresh rate
  • Good brightness
  • Very good response time
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

4.8
32GP850
34WQ73A
3.8
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
6.2 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
20 - 180 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is somewhat better.

Productivity

5.0
32GP850
34WQ73A
6.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$438
32GP850
34WQ73A
$391
Product image
Product image

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

The LG 32GP850 (IPS) has a price of $438 and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) costs $391.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
32GP850
34WQ73A
No
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
32GP850
34WQ73A
Yes
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
32GP850
34WQ73A
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.

Media Consumption

5.5
32GP850
34WQ73A
5.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
32GP850
34WQ73A
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32GP850
34WQ73A
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 32GP850 (IPS)LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
LG 32GP850 (IPS)LG 34WQ73A (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$438
$391
Screen Size
32"34"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Refresh Rate
180Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1037:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
412 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
430 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
6.2 ms10 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 180 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.3/105/10
Ghosting Score
8/107.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
93 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.3/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
6.3/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
10
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
94,100
Recommendations made
14,115
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo