If you favor competitive gaming and high-speed performance, the LG would be an excellent selection with its very good refresh rate and minimal ghosting, though it's not as ideal for productivity due to its smaller screen and aspect ratio. On the other hand, the MSI, while pricier, offers a wider screen and aspect ratio that's better for multitasking and media consumption, along with a glossy screen that can enhance image clarity but may reflect more in brightly lit environments. Both are strong in HDR gaming and media, but the MSI has a slight edge in image quality which is beneficial for print photo editing. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
Excellent for media consumption
Best in class color volume
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
9.5/10
5.1/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
0.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.4 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.7/10
9.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
636 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is good.
Cost
$650
$850
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) has a price of $650 and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) costs $850.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.6/10
9.5/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
636 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
72.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.5 %
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
Productivity
5.8/10
5.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are both poor for productivity.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.